If you're asking about the results of the abolition of national parties in the United States, the answer is even less clear. While parties were not intended to form part of the federal government, and first U.S. President George Washington was staunchly against them, they have become a part of the modern U.S. government: the Speaker of the House of Representatives is the leader of the majority party, while powerful committee chairpersonships are determined by party affiliation.
I would suggest that you examine the constitution and/or laws of the particular country in which you're interested to learn more.
there would be many problems without political parties as without them, all candidates will be alone
-no candidate would be able to promise for any big change as cant be sure govt will support him.
-the govt's utility will remain uncertain as all the ministers wont have same opinions and views.
-there would be no single person/view/group responsible for running of country.
He warned that political parties would become more important than the common good of the country. If you think about the political parties today it seems he can be right about that.
Good question. In recent years the political parties have become more important than the voter. Washington warned 200 years ago that this would happen with political parties. The agenda of the party has become more important than the common good.
If political parties were eliminated, interest groups may have more power as they could have direct access to policymakers without the filter of party influence. However, without parties to provide structure and coordination, interest groups may face challenges in advocating for their positions effectively and could struggle to influence government decisions on a broader scale.
why do politival parties have jingles
by encouraging them to view members of competing parties as enemies
by encouraging them to view members of competing parties as enemies
by encouraging them to view members of competing parties as enemies
Interest groups tend to be able to do more than political parties on specific issues. Political parties are more divisive than interest groups, and less likely to be listened to by members of the other parties.
Russia does have political parties. At present, Russia has four main political parties, which are United Russia, Communist Party of the Russian Federation, Political party LDPR, and A Just Russia. The dominant party is the United Russia.
Washington could see that the political parties would become more important than the common good of the people. Today's political parties are a prime example of what he thought would happen. The fact that congress is unable to conduct business because of the fractions in congress who owe allegiance to powerful corporations or interest groups instead of representing the people who voted them in. This is a perfect example of what Washington warned against. He was right.
By encouraging them to view members of competing parties as enemies
Political parties can control elections through various means such as gerrymandering districts to favor their candidates, using specific messaging and propaganda to influence voters, mobilizing their supporters to turn out to vote, and leveraging financial resources to fund campaigns and advertisements. Additionally, parties often work to recruit and support candidates who align with their ideologies and priorities to increase their chances of winning elections.