Whats risk did Bill Gate take during his success?

Answer 1

He did not foresee that the internet could be used for testimonies of witnesses saying he comitted murder. Go to google and search for dead Microsoft programmers. Search why Gary Kildall had to die. Search for Microsoft Touch Of Death. Or Microsoft Art of Death.

Hitmen are cheap patents are expensive. Dead programmers are worth 70 years of intellectual rights patents only 20.

The secret of Microsoft's success.

Microsoft has special people who search everywhere on the internet for anything that might be a technological advance in mostly software technology because software is easy to steal, buy or copy.

In the 1980's Bill Gates had seen cp/m from Gary Kildall and told IBM that Microsoft could provide an operating system. Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer simply bought a cheap cp/m rip-off named Q-dos for $50,000 illegally stolen by Tim Paterson who simply copied it from disassembled cp/m machine code. Gary Kildall found out and tried to sue IBM and Microsoft. Unfortunately for Gary, Bill Gates father was a powerfull lawyer employed by the Rockefeller family, so the judge made a statement. For every PC wheter an original IBM or a IBM clone, customers had to pay Microsoft even when the customer only wanted Gary's cp/m based dr-dos. These practises are still used by Microsoft today. If you want a laptop or PC you are forced to buy it with a Microsoft product named Windows. They pretend you have a choice to not pay for Windows. Usually if you do not want Windows, they have to take out the harddrive with its Windows recovery partition and to replace it with a clean harddrive. So buying a PC or laptop without Windows will simply cost you more. Most stores however simply refuse you to sell the PC or laptop if you don't want Windows.

Did Microsoft invented Windows themselves? Is Windows stolen technology?

And Bill Gates had seen Xerox Star so he bought such a Xerox Star machine (made in 1978), it would take Microsoft 13 years to duplicate its operating system capabilities, and they named it Windows 3.1.

Meanwhile Gary Kildall got a tragic accident, unexplainable head injury wich caused his death shortly after writing a book that Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer steal technology from whomever they can. Gary's son is still scared of Microsoft so the book remains sealed.

And Microsoft kept on stealing technology. Visicalc became Microsofy Excell. Borland became Microsoft Developer Studio, Wordstar became Microsoft Word. Netscape became Internet Explorer. 3dFx became Microsoft directX, Lernaut&Hauspie became Microsoft speech synthesis and recognition. Even the Windows 95 taskbar and startmenu where stolen from a graphical user interface made by another company in 1987 than named Icon Bar.

Almost nobody knows the original inventors of the by Microsoft stolen technology and about the highly unexplainable death rates under original software inventors. Who knows Stacker? The company from who Microsoft stole their compression technology for filesystems? Even fat32 the filesystem for wich other companies have to pay Microsoft for, was stolen. Microsoft hires special companies to scare programmers and inventors with braindead, cardiac arrest, lifelong unemployement, lifelong prosecution, tragic car accidents (Avalon programmer found dead, Netscape programmers found blood on their PC's, programmers wrapped and choked to death naked in their own bedsheets, Gary Kildall's dead, Remy Belvaux's dead, and many more....) These programmers had all one thing in common, they made something Microsoft wanted, and for some reason Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer simply for no reason wanted them dead. All Microsoft does is hire professional companies to search and kill programmers for their code, work or something else Microsoft wants or sees as a threat. This is Microsoft's business model.

In 2001 e.g. a second grade university student made the graphical command line interface. You just had to see it to know it was innovative. You typed in commands just like dos but it had the same capabilities like a webbrowser and came with its own compiler for it. Imagine a dos prompt with images, buttons, windows, 3d reality, video support, the internet as if it where a directory on your local harddrive. And steve.ballmer@ceo.microsoft.com and bill.gates@chairman.microsoft.com send the young programmer a contract that he would never talk about it, that it now was Microsoft property, Microsoft would not have to pay any costs. But the programmer refused and mailed them he would make it open source. And Steve Ballmer mailed the student it would be tragic to suffer a tragic and horrifying death.

You can search google for 'Steve Ballmer kill....' and you will find that Steve Ballmer even threatens highly placed people with death and evenso boasted that he killed people before.

You don't have to guess, the programmer who made the graphical commandline interface got infected with a tragic bacteria from his PC's keyboard, got blind and later went into coma and drained in his own blood when his lungs collapsed vomiting blood in the process. Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer have special ruthless people specialised in these kind of crimes. The programmers girlfriend experienced a tragic unexplainable head trauma causing prolonged coma, she will never talk again.

These things happen because people believe Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer are kind and loving persons. Students who invent innovative products really believe Microsoft is an honest business.

Meanwhile Bill Gates paid over $40 million dollar to elect George Bush. The first thing Bush did was dropping all antitrust charges from many companies all over America against Microsoft providing Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer with diplomatic immunity. Bill also finances Bush his reelection. As a member of the Gates family Bill and Microsoft have all the support from the highest than CIA official Robert Gates, the Rockerfellers and Rothschilds. Microsofts bribes law officials, police officers, hires companies like Blackwater all to kill off anyone whom they can steal from.

But why does Microsoft not provide the customer with a graphical command line interface? The answer is simple, no matter how good something might be, it does not force people to buy more copies of Microsoft Windows. The graphical commandline interface will one day show up as an invention by Microsoft Research just like oil companies kill off inventors who make engines a tiny bit more efficient.

Compare Microsoft's power with an oil company. One big oil company named Microsoft stealing and killing people who have little bits of oil and then forcing customers to buy Microsoft oil, and a small tiny oil company named Apple, and a company giving their oil away for free named Linux.

Microsoft will ever have to keep on killing young smart but naive programmers all over the world especially before they might contribute to Linux. Microsoft deliberately keeps stolen technology off the market, reducing advancement in operating systems.

Innovative young smart and naive programmers are simply murdered before they can contribute to Linux. These pour souls believe in the lie that Microsoft pays for an invention.

Like steve.ballmer@ceo.microsoft.com once said to such a tragic soul 'Nothing provides me more pleasure than to know you will die an extremely painful death!'

Read more search on google for 'Why I hate Microsoft'

'Xerox Star'

'Programmer found dead'

'Gary Kildall the man who could have been Bill Gates'

'Steve Ballmer kill...'

'Microsoft's touch of death'

When Bush was reelected people thought the voting computers where messed with. You can search for how many Diebold computerprogrammers where found dead suddenly. This is the business model of Microsoft, even bribing the president. See Bush and Gates together celebrating their crimes, google for 'bill gates and bush' on google image search.

The only solution for young programmers is to not innovate. To not make software wich never has been made before. And if they still want to do it, they have to work for free by making it open source and work with many other open source people. Sure Steve Ballmer calls Linux programmers cancers who attach themselves to Microsofts intellectual property, but these programmers have no other choice.

Microsoft is not an example of capitalism. In capitalism several manufacturers or producers offer their products, the market determines a fair price. Compare this to Microsoft's exorbitantly high profit margins over 80%, they simply force their customers to buy it, they kill off any competition. Communism means everything belongs to the state, in this case everything belongs to Microsoft (they even own the president), so Microsoft is far more likely like communism in its worst form, a nightmare for any unknowing naive programmer facing an evil never seen in the software industry before.

Answer 2

For one he dropped out of college to chase his dream of Microsoft.