True
No. Only if the person consents under duress is the 4th Amendment's 'right to privacy' violated.
Non, slaves had no rights. They were considered property. However, by modern standards, they had all their rights violated.
Jail Time For Sure!
A government in power may argue that rights can be violated if
The jury said "ABC has violated the privacy rights of a citizen of the state of North Carolina, and the jury doesn't like it. We all enjoy privacy rights. We insist on privacy rights. And it's not enough to say, well, I'm trying to find the truth. We don't allow the policemen to break into our bedroom. We don't allow the policemen to break in our office, and we don't allow ABC to do that either". So, I would suppose that the jury was upset that ABC basically violated human rights to gather information, using fraudulent techniques to gain the information by lying on their resumes which is against the law.
When you have the right to your privacy
Pizza
The right to bare arms. No shirts, no shoes!
The colonists think the writs of assistance violated their rights because they wanted it to be secure in their home.
yes
nothing