Akbar the Great (15 October 1542 - 27 October 1605)
1556
Akbar
Mughal Emperor Akbar the Great's rule was free of War, tolerant of all religions & spread a love of art & architecture.
modernized and expanded their empires using ideas from other cultures
Akbar is actually a Mughal Emperor who was The ruler in India during the early 1700s. Before Akbar's rule Mughal era was not well known. Akbar was very good with keeping perfect political relations. This ruler singlehandedly almost unfied India in all its multi-ethinicity. However he was still an invader from the west. Hence it is quite ambiguious where he lies on terms of being a good or bad ruler. But in comparison to his grandson aurangazeb who desecrated andd destroyed temples, Akbar was a very good ruler. So yea make your choice.
The Muslim rule in India lasted for almost 1000 years until the Britons invaded the subcontinent.
Till Akbar the Moghul rule was golden period, but then afterwards it declined.
Akbar
Mughal Emperor Akbar the Great's rule was free of War, tolerant of all religions & spread a love of art & architecture.
No. Akbar the Great ruled the modern countries of India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh.
Mughal Emperor Akbar the Great's rule was free of War, tolerant of all religions & spread a love of art & architecture.
akbar ali khan
Akbar's ruling time 1556 to 1605 almost half a century.
modernized and expanded their empires using ideas from other cultures
British rule over India
That the British should not rule over india.
The tea trade and production of tea played an important role in the British rule of India because since Tea was such an important commodity to Britain they needed to get it from either India or China. The tea trade, after all, was the main reason Britain began to rule over India to begin with. Britain no longer wanted to have to rely on China for their supply of tea. Britain began to look for alternatives to China. What they found was India. They were able to produce enough tea to be able to almost completely rely on India instead of China for their tea.
Akbar is actually a Mughal Emperor who was The ruler in India during the early 1700s. Before Akbar's rule Mughal era was not well known. Akbar was very good with keeping perfect political relations. This ruler singlehandedly almost unfied India in all its multi-ethinicity. However he was still an invader from the west. Hence it is quite ambiguious where he lies on terms of being a good or bad ruler. But in comparison to his grandson aurangazeb who desecrated andd destroyed temples, Akbar was a very good ruler. So yea make your choice.