0
Marcus Aurelius was succeeded by this son Commodus.
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why did the empire decline after the death of Marcus Aurelius in AD 180?
Power struggles, Trade was disrupted, and many barbarian mercenaries were hired.
What were some accomplishments of Marcus aurelius?
Marcus Aurelius was a Roman emperor, famous for his philosophical writings, titled "Meditations". He ruled during the era of the "Five Good Emperors" (and was considered one of them) but came to power during troubled times (which some historians describe as the beginning of the decline of the empire), therefore his accomplishments, compared to the Julio-Claudians, for example, were limited. Most of his time as emperor was spent fending off invading Germanic tribes in the north and the Parthian empire in the east.
What three things was Marcus Aurelius able to accomplish?
Here are 3 things Marcus Aurelius accomplished:At age twelve he become a follower of the stoic philosopher Zeno. As a stoic, Marcus controlled his emotions, did what was his duty, and lived simply.He was emperor of Rome from 161 AD to 180 AD. During his reign he invited his adopted brother Verus to rule with him. This was the first time the Roman Empire was ruled by two Emperors.He wrote several books including Meditations, which he wrote (in Greek) during a campaign between 170 and 180 AD. Meditations is a book of passages from one sentence to long paragraphs in length. These passages are about not indulging in emotions, because, he wrote, it is by letting your emotions over power you that other people can harm you. Marcus wrote that instead of living by emotions one should live by reason so that one can not be deceived by misconceptions about what is right and what is wrong.My sources were Famous Men of Rome by John H. Haaren, LL.D. and A.B. Poland, PhD. and the Wickipedia articles on Marcus Aurelius and his book Meditations.
Did the roman empire decline after the death of Marcus Aurelius?
Power struggles Trade was disrupted, hurting the economy Provincial battles Many mercenaries were hired, hurting the economy
Was Marcus Aurelius like the emperors?
Marcus Aurelius was one of the "five good emperors." The term the 'five good emperors' was coined by Machiavelli and is still used today. He said that these emperors were good rulers and exercised good governance. He mentioned six emperors who ruled well: Titus (ruled 71-81)) Nerva (96-98 AD), Trajan (98-117), Hadrian (117-138), Antoninus Pius (138-161) and Marcus Aurelius (161-180). However, he used the term five good emperors because Titus was the son of the emperor Vespasian, while the other five men succeeded by adoption (by the previous emperor). Machiavelli thought that they were good rulers because they did not inherit the throne by birth. They were benign rulers, lived good lives pursued moderate policies, ruled wisely, allowed a lot of freedom and earned the goodwill of the people. He also said that when emperors inherited the throne by birth again, bad rule started again. He wrote: 'From the study of this history we may also learn how a good government is to be established; for while all the emperors who succeeded to the throne by birth, except Titus, were bad, all who were good succeeded by adoption, as in the case of the five from Nerva to Marcus. But as soon as the empire fell once more to the heirs by birth, its ruin recommenced.' The famous 18th century historian Edward Gibbon wrote that during the reign of the five good emperors: "The vast extent of the Roman Empire was governed by absolute power, under the guidance of virtue and wisdom. The armies were restrained by the firm but gentle hand of five successive emperors, whose characters and authority commanded respect. The forms of the civil administration were carefully preserved by [these emperors], who delighted in the image of liberty, and were pleased with considering themselves as the accountable ministers of the laws. Such princes deserved the honour of restoring the republic had the Romans of their days been capable of enjoying a rational freedom." Marcus Aurelius was highly praised and was remembered by posterity saw him as a' philosopher-king.' Besides being an emperor, he was a Stoic philosopher. He wrote the 'Meditationes', a book on his meditations based on stoic philosophy. Marcus Aurelius was also distinguished from his extensive knowledge and keen interest in the law. He was described as "an emperor most skilled in the law" and "a most prudent and conscientiously just emperor." He paid a lot of attention to legal theory and practice. He was particularly active on legislation about the manumission (emancipation) of slaves and the guardianship of orphans and minors. He took an active interest in the choice of the decurions (town councillors). Herodian, who wrote the History of the Empire from the Death of Marcus, said: "Alone of the emperors, [Marcus Aurelius] gave proof of his learning not by mere words or knowledge of philosophical doctrines but by his blameless character and temperate way of life." In the Justinian Code Marcus Aurelius was described as "a most prudent and conscientiously just emperor and an emperor most skilled in the law." Christian writers also praised him, even though he was a pagan. Melitus said that he was more philanthropic and philosophic than his two predecessors who also were among the five good emperors. There were wars through most of the reign of Marcus Aurelius. He entrusted Lucius Verus, his co-emperor to fight the Parthian War (16166) against the Parthian Empire of the Persians. He fought the two Marcomannic Wars (166-180) against the many peoples who were invading the Roman Empire from across the Danube River.
Who was the emperor in power of Moesia Superior?
Marcus Licinius Crassus
Why did the empire decline after the death of Marcus Aurelius in AD 180?
Power struggles, Trade was disrupted, and many barbarian mercenaries were hired.
How did the Roman Empire decline after the death of Marcus Aurelius?
Power struggles Trade was disrupted, hurting the economy Provincial battles Many mercenaries were hired, hurting the economy
What were some accomplishments of Marcus aurelius?
Marcus Aurelius was a Roman emperor, famous for his philosophical writings, titled "Meditations". He ruled during the era of the "Five Good Emperors" (and was considered one of them) but came to power during troubled times (which some historians describe as the beginning of the decline of the empire), therefore his accomplishments, compared to the Julio-Claudians, for example, were limited. Most of his time as emperor was spent fending off invading Germanic tribes in the north and the Parthian empire in the east.
Why did Lucius Verus rule as co-emperor with Marcus Aurelius?
the emperor Antonius Pious, on his death bed, declared that he wanted both men to rule as equals. many were shocked by his descion for it was widely accepted that marcus would be his heir. but the senate did as he wished crowning both men as co-emperors thus sharing authority and power, though marcus was by far a more effective and just leader eventually becoming the sole emperor after verus' death while on a war campaign. maybe pious was trying to reinforce the old ways with the duel cousul or mayb he was trying to avoid one man having too much power either way the senate bent to his wisjing creating the co-emperiship
How did diocletian become king?
Marcus Aurelius named his son his heir, but his son was considered mentally unstable. The Roman Empire was now very unstable. More than 80 men claimed to be emperor, and many of them were assassinated. 100 years later, Diocletian gained power, and split the Roman Empire into the east and the west. Hope this helps :)
What three things was Marcus Aurelius able to accomplish?
Here are 3 things Marcus Aurelius accomplished:At age twelve he become a follower of the stoic philosopher Zeno. As a stoic, Marcus controlled his emotions, did what was his duty, and lived simply.He was emperor of Rome from 161 AD to 180 AD. During his reign he invited his adopted brother Verus to rule with him. This was the first time the Roman Empire was ruled by two Emperors.He wrote several books including Meditations, which he wrote (in Greek) during a campaign between 170 and 180 AD. Meditations is a book of passages from one sentence to long paragraphs in length. These passages are about not indulging in emotions, because, he wrote, it is by letting your emotions over power you that other people can harm you. Marcus wrote that instead of living by emotions one should live by reason so that one can not be deceived by misconceptions about what is right and what is wrong.My sources were Famous Men of Rome by John H. Haaren, LL.D. and A.B. Poland, PhD. and the Wickipedia articles on Marcus Aurelius and his book Meditations.
Did the roman empire decline after the death of Marcus Aurelius?
Power struggles Trade was disrupted, hurting the economy Provincial battles Many mercenaries were hired, hurting the economy
Was Marcus Aurelius like other Emperors of the time?
Marcus Aurelius was one of the "five good emperors." The term the 'five good emperors' was coined by Machiavelli and is still used today. He said that these emperors were good rulers and exercised good governance. He mentioned six emperors who ruled well: Titus (ruled 71-81)) Nerva (96-98 AD), Trajan (98-117), Hadrian (117-138), Antoninus Pius (138-161) and Marcus Aurelius (161-180). However, he used the term five good emperors because Titus was the son of the emperor Vespasian, while the other five men succeeded by adoption (by the previous emperor). Machiavelli thought that they were good rulers because they did not inherit the throne by birth. They were benign rulers, lived good lives pursued moderate policies, ruled wisely, allowed a lot of freedom and earned the goodwill of the people. He also said that when emperors inherited the throne by birth again, bad rule started again. He wrote: 'From the study of this history we may also learn how a good government is to be established; for while all the emperors who succeeded to the throne by birth, except Titus, were bad, all who were good succeeded by adoption, as in the case of the five from Nerva to Marcus. But as soon as the empire fell once more to the heirs by birth, its ruin recommenced.' The famous 18th century historian Edward Gibbon wrote that during the reign of the five good emperors: "The vast extent of the Roman Empire was governed by absolute power, under the guidance of virtue and wisdom. The armies were restrained by the firm but gentle hand of five successive emperors, whose characters and authority commanded respect. The forms of the civil administration were carefully preserved by [these emperors], who delighted in the image of liberty, and were pleased with considering themselves as the accountable ministers of the laws. Such princes deserved the honour of restoring the republic had the Romans of their days been capable of enjoying a rational freedom." Marcus Aurelius was highly praised and was remembered by posterity saw him as a' philosopher-king.' Besides being an emperor, he was a Stoic philosopher. He wrote the 'Meditationes', a book on his meditations based on stoic philosophy. Marcus Aurelius was also distinguished from his extensive knowledge and keen interest in the law. He was described as "an emperor most skilled in the law" and "a most prudent and conscientiously just emperor." He paid a lot of attention to legal theory and practice. He was particularly active on legislation about the manumission (emancipation) of slaves and the guardianship of orphans and minors. He took an active interest in the choice of the decurions (town councillors). Herodian, who wrote the History of the Empire from the Death of Marcus, said: "Alone of the emperors, [Marcus Aurelius] gave proof of his learning not by mere words or knowledge of philosophical doctrines but by his blameless character and temperate way of life." In the Justinian Code Marcus Aurelius was described as "a most prudent and conscientiously just emperor and an emperor most skilled in the law." Christian writers also praised him, even though he was a pagan. Melitus said that he was more philanthropic and philosophic than his two predecessors who also were among the five good emperors. There were wars through most of the reign of Marcus Aurelius. He entrusted Lucius Verus, his co-emperor to fight the Parthian War (16166) against the Parthian Empire of the Persians. He fought the two Marcomannic Wars (166-180) against the many peoples who were invading the Roman Empire from across the Danube River.
Was Marcus Aurelius like the emperors?
Marcus Aurelius was one of the "five good emperors." The term the 'five good emperors' was coined by Machiavelli and is still used today. He said that these emperors were good rulers and exercised good governance. He mentioned six emperors who ruled well: Titus (ruled 71-81)) Nerva (96-98 AD), Trajan (98-117), Hadrian (117-138), Antoninus Pius (138-161) and Marcus Aurelius (161-180). However, he used the term five good emperors because Titus was the son of the emperor Vespasian, while the other five men succeeded by adoption (by the previous emperor). Machiavelli thought that they were good rulers because they did not inherit the throne by birth. They were benign rulers, lived good lives pursued moderate policies, ruled wisely, allowed a lot of freedom and earned the goodwill of the people. He also said that when emperors inherited the throne by birth again, bad rule started again. He wrote: 'From the study of this history we may also learn how a good government is to be established; for while all the emperors who succeeded to the throne by birth, except Titus, were bad, all who were good succeeded by adoption, as in the case of the five from Nerva to Marcus. But as soon as the empire fell once more to the heirs by birth, its ruin recommenced.' The famous 18th century historian Edward Gibbon wrote that during the reign of the five good emperors: "The vast extent of the Roman Empire was governed by absolute power, under the guidance of virtue and wisdom. The armies were restrained by the firm but gentle hand of five successive emperors, whose characters and authority commanded respect. The forms of the civil administration were carefully preserved by [these emperors], who delighted in the image of liberty, and were pleased with considering themselves as the accountable ministers of the laws. Such princes deserved the honour of restoring the republic had the Romans of their days been capable of enjoying a rational freedom." Marcus Aurelius was highly praised and was remembered by posterity saw him as a' philosopher-king.' Besides being an emperor, he was a Stoic philosopher. He wrote the 'Meditationes', a book on his meditations based on stoic philosophy. Marcus Aurelius was also distinguished from his extensive knowledge and keen interest in the law. He was described as "an emperor most skilled in the law" and "a most prudent and conscientiously just emperor." He paid a lot of attention to legal theory and practice. He was particularly active on legislation about the manumission (emancipation) of slaves and the guardianship of orphans and minors. He took an active interest in the choice of the decurions (town councillors). Herodian, who wrote the History of the Empire from the Death of Marcus, said: "Alone of the emperors, [Marcus Aurelius] gave proof of his learning not by mere words or knowledge of philosophical doctrines but by his blameless character and temperate way of life." In the Justinian Code Marcus Aurelius was described as "a most prudent and conscientiously just emperor and an emperor most skilled in the law." Christian writers also praised him, even though he was a pagan. Melitus said that he was more philanthropic and philosophic than his two predecessors who also were among the five good emperors. There were wars through most of the reign of Marcus Aurelius. He entrusted Lucius Verus, his co-emperor to fight the Parthian War (16166) against the Parthian Empire of the Persians. He fought the two Marcomannic Wars (166-180) against the many peoples who were invading the Roman Empire from across the Danube River.
Name the roman emperor to succeed Julius Caesar?
Caesar wasn't an emperor, but if one person were to be named his immediate successor in the position of supreme power in the Roman Republic, it would be his ally, Marcus Antonius (Mark Antony).
What is Marcus's power in New Moon?
Marcus's Power is , he can see bond/relationships between people.
