When they find probable cause, you told a friend you did it and where you hid the evidence, that would be probable cause.
Search of a vehicle in conjunction with a lawful arrest.
Only if they have reasonable suspision or probable cause. Otherwise No.
deal with who can consent/object to a lawful search of a vehicle
U.S. v. Robinson
Lawful minorities have a right to be considered and treated fairly by the Government in a democracy.
I think its Omitted statements of material facts
Anything found in the course of a lawful search will be admissible. If the weapon search was proper, the drugs are just a nice bonus
Unless the officer discovered probable cause during the traffic stop (or had probable cause prior to), then no, the search was illegal. The officer would have needed to obtain probable cause to search the vehicle, in reference to Carroll v. United States. The prior answer referenced "Search Incident to Lawful Arrest" and that was incorrect. During a traffic stop for speeding, generally, no one is being arrested, and "Search Incident to Lawful Arrest" only allows the the officer to search for evidence related to the arrest, which for speeding, there wouldn't be any such evidence.
United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218 (1973)
Yes, but not as completely as if they were adults. Being minors there ARE other constraints imposed on them that are considered lawful.
The officer issued a lawful order. It was not lawful to take control of the vehicle. It would have to be a lawful taking for it to hold up in court.
The opposite prefix to "lawful" is "un-," so the opposite of "lawful" would be "unlawful."