Want this question answered?
Better than a hot war.
Sure: My actions at the Alamo are justified as is my participation in them!
Adolf Hitler was an ethnic German, and the Germanic people are part of the broader Indo-European linguistic and ethnic group. However, it is important to note that being Indo-European does not determine a person's political beliefs or actions. Hitler's ideologies and actions were based on his own beliefs and motivations.
The Supreme Court's decision that slavery enjoyed total protection by the Constitution.
He was not the only member of the Committee of Public Safety. There were eleven other members who deserve as much blame as he does, but yes, he is to blame.
Not everyone will agree. If you believe Bonifacio's actions were tresonous, yes his execution was justified. If you believe his actions were not treasonous, then his execution was not justified.
Whether or not Lincoln's actions were justified is a matter of opinion. His actions had two purposes: he wanted to preserve the union and he wanted to end slavery. Compare that with perhaps one million men dead. In my opinion his actions were justified. You will have to decide for yourself.
Odysseus' actions may seem justified in the context of the challenges he faced and the need for survival during his journey. However, some of his actions, such as blinding the Cyclops, can be seen as ruthless and vengeful. Ultimately, whether his actions are justified is open to interpretation based on moral and ethical perspectives.
idk
no
no
Europeans believed it was their duty to bring civilization, Christianity, and modernity to the regions they colonized. They often justified their actions by claiming a civilizing mission or a "white man's burden" to uplift and educate indigenous peoples.
no,
Pete's actions were not justified in the story, although he tried to make up for his actions by staying near Cecile and the 8 children (Ralph's wife and their children) after he was released from the hospital, to help them out.
yes
George Washington Plunkintt
jacckson was justified becaue he was righht and he was trying to help the poor instead of the rich getting more money