0
When two people disagree on factual matter can they both be right?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Yes, and in most cases, that is the case.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
No, if two people are in disagreement about a factual matter, it is not possible for both of them to be right. Facts are objective and do not change based on individual beliefs or opinions. They are based on evidence and can be verified through research or observation.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How many people are watching tv right now?
I don't have real-time data on the number of people watching TV right now. Television viewership can vary greatly depending on the time of day, day of the week, and specific programming that is being aired.
What academic subjects are right brained students good at?
Right-brained students often excel in subjects that involve creativity, imagination, and holistic thinking, such as art, music, drama, and creative writing. They may also perform well in subjects that require a strong ability to visualize and think spatially, such as geometry or design.
What is a deductive thesis?
A deductive thesis is a type of argumentative statement where logical reasoning is used to support a specific claim or conclusion. It involves starting with a general principle or premise and then applying it to a specific case to reach a logical conclusion.
What is the difference between the divine right theory and the social-contract theory?
The divine right theory asserts that rulers derive their authority from God and are responsible only to God. In contrast, the social-contract theory posits that political authority is derived from an implicit agreement among individuals to form a society and abide by its rules, with the government serving the people's interests.
Can a rhombus have four right angels?
No, by definition a rhombus has all angles equal, but they are not right angles. A square is a type of rhombus with four right angles.
05What do you do when people disagree with your ideas?
when people disagree with my ideas i usally go in a right way with a motive that i should show the that i was right with my ideas.i undergo the matter deeply and search why people are not agreeing with my ideas .iafter anyalizing my ideas if i am right then i clearly show them them facts that my idea was right.
How come WikiAnswers is not always right?
WikiAnswers is not always right because we can put in any answer we want. So it doesn't matter if the answer is factual, for at least it's on there.Because the answer are being answered by mainly people, not computers' operators.That's a put downer
Why do people disagree with the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights?
I didn't know anyone in their right mind would disagree with it.
Who are more factual the left or the right?
the right
Do people have the freedom to disagree with the government in Australia?
The freedom of political speech is an implied right, in the Australian constitution.
Why would someone disagree with this statement people think differently?
this question does not make sense but i got the answer here it is people disagree with people who agree to disagree because they have a reason to its not like they just say nope nope that's wrong were right blah Di Dar De do that's wrong for i don't know what everyone should have a reason to why there disagreeing
Can two people both be 'on good authority' if they both totally disagree on an answer?
Yes they can, 'on good authority' means you trust your source. If you disagree, the source of one, or both, is faulty, Never believe you alone get the right info.
What is the synonyms of true?
correct, accurate, right, verifiable, so; literal, factual
Does a patient have the right to disagree with his doctor and complain that the incision needed more stitches?
You have every right to disagree. But on medical practicalities, such as whether a wound needs more stitches or not, who knows more?
What elbow do people get a spider web tattoo on?
right elbow but it dosent matter
Do you see real vampires?
no you do not see real vampires i disagree. if you at the right place at the right time.
What was protagoras view on moral relativism and skepticism about knowledge?
Protagoras believed in personal relativism, in other words, simple subjectivism. Subjectivism means that any judgement a person makes is solely based on their personal opinion on the matter. This means that their view is neither right nor wrong because it is an opinion. He also believed that two people could not disagree on a matter, but simply voice their opinions.
