Tsar Nicholas II was crowned in 1894.
Nicholas II was the last Czar. There had been a Nicholas I before him. Your question did not specify which Nicholas was being referred to. There is some theory that either Michael Romanov, Nicholas II's brother, or Alexei Romanov, Nicholas II's son, was the actual last Czar but this is non-sense. The theory that Michael was the last Czar is based on the fact that when Nicholas II abdicated the throne, he passed it on to his brother Michael who refused it, was never crowned and never acted as Czar. The then existing Russian Constitution stated that the Czar could not give the crown to anyone he chose, but that it had to go to his eldest son first. The abdication in Michael's favor was therefore illegal and of no effect. Since he was never the Czar he couldn't have been the last one. The theory that Alexei was the last Czar is also based on the fact that the abdication in favor of Michael was illegal. Since the Constitution stated that the crown fell to the Czar's eldest son, the speculation is that when Nicholas II abdicated, the crown automatically fell to Alexei regardless of the abdication in favor of Michael. The problem with this theory is that Alexei was never crowned Czar and never acted as Czar. Again, since he was never the Czar, he could not have been the last one either.
Nicholas II, the last Romanov Tsar (czar).
Czar Nicholas II
Czar Nicholas II
Nicholas Romanov II was Czar before the Russian Revolution.
Nicholas II was the last Czar. There had been a Nicholas I before him. Your question did not specify which Nicholas was being referred to. There is some theory that either Michael Romanov, Nicholas II's brother, or Alexei Romanov, Nicholas II's son, was the actual last Czar but this is non-sense. The theory that Michael was the last Czar is based on the fact that when Nicholas II abdicated the throne, he passed it on to his brother Michael who refused it, was never crowned and never acted as Czar. The then existing Russian Constitution stated that the Czar could not give the crown to anyone he chose, but that it had to go to his eldest son first. The abdication in Michael's favor was therefore illegal and of no effect. Since he was never the Czar he couldn't have been the last one. The theory that Alexei was the last Czar is also based on the fact that the abdication in favor of Michael was illegal. Since the Constitution stated that the crown fell to the Czar's eldest son, the speculation is that when Nicholas II abdicated, the crown automatically fell to Alexei regardless of the abdication in favor of Michael. The problem with this theory is that Alexei was never crowned Czar and never acted as Czar. Again, since he was never the Czar, he could not have been the last one either.
Nicholas II, the last Romanov Tsar (czar).
Czar Nicholas II
Czar Nicholas II
Czar Nicholas II
Nicholas II
Nicholas Romanov II was Czar before the Russian Revolution.
Nicholas II became the Tsar in 1894 at the age of 26. His reign lasted until March 15th, 1917 at the age of 49. He died one year later at the age of 50 after being shot three times in the chest. He was the first one to be killed the night the Romanov family was assassinated.
Czar Nicholas II
The Last Czar, He was Murdered by Bolsheviks.
Queen Victoria and Czar Nicholas II were distantly related through ancestry but through marriage Queen Victoria was the grandmother of Czar Nicholas II. Queen Victoria's granddaughter Alexandra (the daughter of Victoria's daughter Alice) married Czar Nicholas II in 1894.
Nicholas II