my mom
Criticize
We have a freedom of speech in the US therefore we are free to criticize our government if we do not agree with them.
They are fundamental and spelled out or enumerated.Edited-guarantees freedom of religion-freedom of speech-freedom to press-assembly (the social act of assembling)"they demanded the right to assembly"-the right of people to petition the government (criticize the government)
I assume that the "freedom of speech" referred to in the question relates to freedom of speech in the United States of America. The free speech provisions of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees only that citizens cannot be punished by their government for uttering protected speech. The aim of that Amendment is to guarantee that people are free to criticize their government without fear of punishment by that government, and it is one of our most precious liberties. A policeman merely telling you to "shut up" does not rise to the level of government punishment that would raise a First Amendment issue without more. If you were protesting something (say, a government action or policy), the police could say "shut up" all they wanted, but you would have to be arrested (deprived of liberty) for a Constitutional issue to arise. Not all speech is protected under the First Amendment. And not all reactions to even protected speech raise Constitutional issues.
No that was the Sedition ActThe sedition acts made it illegal to publish anything negative about government and government officials. They still had freedom of speech. The act was repealed in 1801 anyway. So, we have never had a law to where it was illegal to criticize the government.
1st amendment ; Religious & Political freedom
Criticize
The First Amendment relates to your right of free speech, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. However, this is not a free pass. While you've the right to post something online about how you don't like the Department of Motor Vehicles, if you criticize one of them while at the DMV, you may well be asked (made) to leave. Likewise, discussions on the nature of liberty will not be allowed at airport security points. Or a lot of other places. You should regard your "right" to criticize a government official as on a par with your "right" to bear arms. You, by a literal reading of the Constitution, have a "right" to do either, with no restrictions. But you'd do well to exercise MUCH prudence.
They are fundamental and spelled out or enumerated.Edited-guarantees freedom of religion-freedom of speech-freedom to press-assembly (the social act of assembling)"they demanded the right to assembly"-the right of people to petition the government (criticize the government)
1st Amendment
Treason
It allows citizens to criticize the government,in speech or in the press,without fear of punishment.
We have a freedom of speech in the US therefore we are free to criticize our government if we do not agree with them.
No. Quite the opposite. American generally criticize a slow government response to Hurricane Katrina.
They are fundamental and spelled out or enumerated.Edited-guarantees freedom of religion-freedom of speech-freedom to press-assembly (the social act of assembling)"they demanded the right to assembly"-the right of people to petition the government (criticize the government)
The only amendment that comes to mind quickly is the first, which gives citizens the right to freedom of speech and press, among other things. There may be another that is more precise--I'm not sure. The first amendment is the only one I can think of off th top of my head, and it seems applicable.
Yes, this is considered to be covered by the First Amendment, which grants, among other freedoms, freedom of speech, allowing any US citizen to say anything they want to anybody.