The US Supreme Court has applied most of the first eight amendments in the Bill of Rights to the States through the doctrine of "selective incorporation" primarily via the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause.
The states have to follow the precedent set in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963). The US Supreme Court used the fourteenth Amendment due process clause to incorporate the Sixth Amendment right to counsel to the states. This reversed their earlier decision in Betts v Brady.
No. The states are required to follow their ownstate statutes and constitutions, which are unique to each state.The doctrine of stare decisis would strongly encourage both Georgia and Florida to follow US Supreme Court decisions on questions of federal and constitutional law, with the exception of cases involving unincorporated constitutional Amendments. Unincorporated Amendments and clauses are those portions of the Bill of Rights that have not (yet) been held to apply to the states under the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause, such as the Second Amendment (right to bear arms). Issues involving unincorporated Amendments are regulated by the states.
No. It does not in itself have legal meaning. At the time it was written, the preamble was an introductory statement for what was to follow. It states the purposes for which the United States Constitution was written.
they therefore had to follow that law
Yes they can if the opposing team hangs on to the target
The Fifth Amendment applies to the due process clause. This amendment was one of the reconstruction amendments that was adopted on July 9, 1868.
No amendments address torture, but it is part of the Geneva convention and considered a rule that all should have and follow.
Absolutely not! For one, bad guys do not follow the law, and will smuggle in guns. When they do that, the law-abiding citizens will have nothing to defend themselves with. Also, the job of the supreme court is to interpret the constitution. The 2nd amendment says, "A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." If the supreme court banned guns, that would be doing the thing it is not supposed to be doing.More information:The US Supreme Court upheld the Second Amendment right to bear arms in District of Columbia v. Heller, (2008) and McDonald v. Chicago, (2010). The McDonald ruling incorporated the Second Amendment to the states, ensuring states cannot pass overly restrictive laws regarding gun ownership. Banning guns altogether would be unconstitutional.
missouri does not have to follow the laws of another state
That the law doesn't follow the constitution.
incorporation
The Twelfth Amendment made the voting process uniform.