Sometimes either. A civil case may be tried in the state of the party filing suit, or a party can invoke federal diversity jurisdiction and remove the case to federal court if the amount of the claim is in excess of $75,000.
Yes, under certain circumstances federal courts hear civil cases involving "federal diversity jurisdiction," in which the litigants live in different states. In order to invoke federal diversity jurisdiction the claim must exceed $75,000.
These are known as cases of diversity jurisdiction.
Title 28, United States Code, section 1332 is headed "Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs". It generally provides that the parties must be citizens of different states, or a citizen of a State and a citizen of a foreign nation, or a foreign nation itself. The amount in controversy must exceed $75,000.
Also, parties of diverse citizenship can and are routinely subject to federal question jurisdiction in federal courts.
Federal cases involving citizens of different states are called "diversity" cases if that is the claimed basis for Federal court jurisdiction.
Federal courts hear cases with federal jurisdiction. Such jurisdiction comes if the case hears a question of federal law or if the case has diversity jurisdiction (parties are citizens of different states and minimum dollar amount is in dispute.)
Under the Constitution, the federal courts have jurisdiction over a number of kinds of suits involving state citizens. Since Dred Scott's case involved citizens of different states, the chief justice could have said that free blacks in states that considered them citizens could bring certain cases into federal courts.
Federal courts have legal authority over cases involving federal laws and the interpretation of the United States Constitution. They also have jurisdiction over cases involving disputes between different states or between the United States and a foreign country.
United States District Courts have original jurisdiction over cases involving federal crimes, civil suits under federal law, civil suits between citizens of different states, admiralty and maritime cases, bankruptcy cases, actions of certain federal administrative agencies, and other matters that may be assigned to them by Congress.
A: Only federal courts handle cases between citizens of different states
Federal diversity jurisdiction (diversity of citizenship) allows citizens of different states to file civil action against each other in federal court (instead of state court) under certain circumstances. Diversity jurisdiction may be invoked for civil cases involving claims in excess of $75,000.
Citizens of different states are equal under the law.
A diversity of citizens case is a lawsuit which does not involve any federal issues and would not normally be heard in the federal court, except that the case involves a certain amount of money and the parties are citizens of different states or countries. This jurisdiction was created in the federal courts to make sure that out of state parties who had to file their complaints and answers in state courts where they did not live were not discriminated against. Title 28 of the United States Code, Section 1332 states the requirement. Essentially, the requirements are that the amount in controversy must be over $75,000.00 and the parties are either 1. Citizens of different states; 2. Citizens of a state and of a foreign country; 3. Some combination of citizens of different states and citizens of foreign countries; 4. A foreign country as plaintiff and citizens of a state or states. It is not mandatory that such cases be heard in the federal District Court. Plaintiffs have the option to file a case there if they so desire. If the case is filed in a state court, the defendant may ask that the case be transferred to a federal court.
The Anti-Federalists wanted to protect citizens and the states against federal power.
Cases (1) that involve a question of federal law and (2) cases in which the plaintiff and defendant are in different states and there is more than $75,000 at stake.
The Anti-Federalists wanted to protect citizens and the states against federal power.