answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Using pathos in an argument can help to evoke emotions in the audience, making the argument more relatable and engaging. It can also be used to establish a connection with the audience and inspire them to take action based on their emotional responses.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

5d ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Which iof the following is a reason to use pathos as part of an argument?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Philosophy

When passing an argument by reference the module can modify the argument in the calling part of the program?

Yes, when passing an argument by reference, changes to the argument made within the module will directly affect the original variable in the calling part of the program. This is because the reference to the original variable's memory address is passed to the module, allowing it to modify the variable directly.


Is a part of an argument that is flawed and makes the argument invalid an error in reasoning?

Yes, a flawed part of an argument constitutes an error in reasoning which can render the overall argument invalid or weak. Common errors in reasoning include logical fallacies, false premises, inconsistencies, and incorrect assumptions. Identifying and addressing these errors is crucial for building sound and persuasive arguments.


What is a part of an argument that is flawed and makes the argument invalid an error in reasoning.?

A common error in reasoning that can make an argument invalid is known as a logical fallacy. These are flaws in the logical structure of an argument that can mislead or deceive the audience. Examples of logical fallacies include ad hominem attacks, appeal to authority, and circular reasoning.


What are the two parts of an argument?

The two parts of a logical argument are the premise (or premises) and the conclusion. The premise is the part of an argument that visibly have evidence or logical steps to reach a conclusion. A conclusion is the result of the reasoning in the premise.


Can an argument be valid with false conclusions?

No, an argument is considered valid only if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. If the conclusion is false, it means there is an issue with the soundness of the argument rather than just the validity.

Related questions

Why would you use pathos as part of an argument?

Pathos is the presence of emPATHy, symPATHetic, aPATHetic. When properly used in a speech pathos can be very influential. For example, a candidate for an election might use empathy, or the ability to look through the eyes of others, to appeal to the people as a more representative ruler.


Which did Mandela use in this part of his statement?

pathos


The part of the work that appeals to the emotions of the audience is called?

Pathos


What part of speech is path?

The word pathos is a noun. It is an uncountable noun.


The structure of an argument can be somewhat complex The supported part of an argument is known as the?

conclusion


What is an example of speech that would be restricted?

In a personal argument the use of obscenity.


What is the part of an argument that is flawed and makes the argument invalid an error in reasoning?

That would be a moot point


What part of the historian's argument references specific examples of historical evidence?

Based on this information, he argues that the French Revolution produced far more negative outcomes than positive ones.


What part of speech is argument?

Argument is a noun. The plural form is arguments.


What is a summation?

the concluding part of an argument before a court of law.


When passing an argument by reference the module can modify the argument in the calling part of the program?

Yes, when passing an argument by reference, changes to the argument made within the module will directly affect the original variable in the calling part of the program. This is because the reference to the original variable's memory address is passed to the module, allowing it to modify the variable directly.


What names the part of an opening argument that is meant to quickly interest the jury?

The part of an opening argument designed to quickly interest the jury is typically referred to as the "hook" or "opening statement." It is often a compelling or attention-grabbing introduction to set the stage for the rest of the argument.