That is a book whose existence only a few remember.
Are this correct sentences? "Though she had only recently visited there, he could not remember it. They were surprised and everyone understood. They were difficult, but she welcomed his conversations despite everything."
That is correct. The existence of God, in fact of any god, can not be proven by any scientific means. His existence can only be assumed, by those who wish to do so. It is sometimes claimed that the Bible proves the existence of God, because to Bible tells us about God, and the Bible is God's word so it must be true. Of course, that is a circular argument that resolves as an assumption, not proof.
There is no CORRECT answer to that, only various opinions.
when will earth be wiped out of existence? We ARE NOT the only existence in the universe.
Correct. Monotremes are egg-laying mammals. They belong to the order known as Monotremata. The only monotremes still in existence are platypuses and echidnas.
Best To Throw It Out And Mix It Correct. Remember This Is The Only Lubrication The Engine Is Getting.
The existence of God cannot be proven. However, the non-existence of God also cannot be proven. "An absence of proof does not equal a proof of absence" Therefore those who insist there IS a God and those who insist there IS NO God are equally correct, as both are taking the matter on faith and nothing else. Only Agnostics are correct as they hold that the existence of a Diety may or may not be true, but cannot be known without actual, rational, physical proof.
I lie the book on the table. NOW I laid the book down when I finished with it. PAST Lie down now! When did you lie down yesterday? (The rule: Chickens lay eggs. Everything else lies. Laid is correct only when applied to past tense)
In the world of Eragon, Durza is not the only shade in existence. Shades are sorcerers who have allowed dark magic to corrupt them, turning them into powerful and malevolent beings. While Durza is a significant shade in the story, there are others mentioned throughout the series.
Yes it is.The word "me" is the object of the preposition "to." Objects must be in the objective case. The objective case of the pronoun "I" is "me."An easy way to remember this is, you would not say She gave the book to I. You would say She gave the book to me. So you must also say She gave the book to Lisa and me.Many people have trouble with this because they remember their first grade teachers telling them that they shouldn't say Lisa and me went to the park. Their teachers tell them to say Lisa and I went to the park. From this they conclude that "Lisa and me" is never correct. That is the wrong conclusion.Lisa and I went to the park is correct because "I" is part of the subject of the sentence, so you must use "I" instead of "me." Again, you would say I went to the park (NOT Me went to the park) so use must use Lisa and I went to the park.
who knows and who cares!
They are called codices, which is the correct term for any book that isn't a scroll