0
Which of the following groups argued that slavery was necessary for the economy?
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
In ancient societies, slavery was used for a nation's economy as a normal part of the world from the view of ancient rulers and slave owners. Using ancient Rome as an example, any enemy who fought against the power of Rome and lost, the enemy and their families would be kept as slaves or sold into slavery to other trade friendly nations.In modern times, meaning for example the 1600's to the end of the 19th century, slave owners believed that cheap slave labor helped themselves and the economy.
In the Southern states of the United States, slaves were also a way of life and as in other times, a cheap source of labor. The idea of white slavery was not possible, African Blacks were deemed fit to only be slaves based on race.
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Lordz Svrite
WatJuTalmBout
Southern plantation owners👌🏽
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is a sentence for Economy?
In today life, the economy is bad because some people don't have jobs or any money to survive their surroundings and their bills.The word economy is a noun. A sentence for economy is, 'They argued about whether or not tax cuts were good for the overall economy.'
Who argued that national governments should increase their spending to stimulate the economy during an economic recession?
John Maynard Keynes
Does a command economy use ration coupons?
In times of scarcity, a command economy can use rationing, but then, it could be argued that any time rationing is used, that is a form of command economy. In better economic circumstances, command economies just use money. Since a command economy controls how much money everybody has, money then serves almost the same function as a ration coupon.
Who was the economist who believed that massive government spending programs could revive a failing economy?
There are many economists who have argued this, but the most major one is arguably John Maynard Keynes.
Was slavery an economic issues?
Yes it was. That was the whole point behind white slave owners arguments for slavery. They argued there plantations could not run properly without slaves picking the amount of cotton needed to be picked daily. Without the amount being reached the South could not export its most important crop.
Which is an example of Southerners' arguments used in defense of slavery?
They argued that slavery contributed to the prosperous economy.
What US senator represented the South and argued that slavery was necessary?
John C. Calhoun
Which U.S. senator represented the South and argued that slavery was necessary?
John C. Calhoun
What were some of the proslaverly arguments?
Proslavery arguments were based on the notion that slavery was a necessary part of the economy and a "positive good" for slaves. Those who supported slavery argued that it was a beneficial institution providing economic stability and protection for the slaves. Some of the most common proslavery arguments included: Slavery was beneficial to the slaves providing them with a secure and stable life protection and basic needs like food clothing and shelter. Slavery provided economic stability for the slave-owning class. Slavery was a necessary evil for the continuation of the Southern economy. Slavery was a natural way of life and the slaves were better off in servitude than in a free society. Slavery was a form of punishment for people who had done wrong in the past. Slavery was a form of "divine mandate" from God.Ultimately proslavery arguments were attempts to justify the institution of slavery and to refute any moral or ethical objections to it.
What was not an advocate for the abolition of slavery?
One example of someone who was not an advocate for the abolition of slavery was John C. Calhoun. Calhoun was a prominent southern politician who vehemently defended slavery and argued for its preservation. He believed that slavery was a positive good and essential for the southern economy and way of life.
What arguments did white southerns use to defend slavery?
That cotton was America's biggest export, so the institution of slavery was beneficial. That slaves were simple, happy folk, content with their lot. That the slaves were much better-off in America than they would have been in Africa. That slavery was a perfect God-given arrangement of master and man. They called it a states rights issue. They argued that slaves were property or animals, not people, and were thus not entitled to rights. The best "scientists" of that day considered people with dark skin to be inferior. The southerners said slavery was necessary to help the economy. They convinced themselves that they were doing people from Africa a favor. They argued that slavery was a time-honored tradition and that even Africans sold other Africans into slavery.
Couldn't it be argued that slavery is a bit racialist?
A bit ?? Slavery was 100 % race related.
How was moral suasion by abolitionists as an argument against slavery?
abolitionists argued that slavery was morally wrong
How was moral suasion by abolitionists as as argument against slavery?
abolitionists argued that slavery was morally wrong
Did The Commonwealthmen argued that the loss of liberty equaled slavery?
True
Lincoln argued against the spread of slavery but he did not call for?
abolition
How was moral suasion used by abolitionists as an argument against slavery?
abolitionists argued that slavery was morally wrong
