Want this question answered?
William Marbury is significant in the annals of history because it was his commission that John Adams failed to deliver on time and James Madison refused to sign. This led to the Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison, in which John Marshall first put forth the idea of judicial review.
In Marbury v. Madison, William Marbury was the plaintiff. He was a Federalist and a commission he was supposed to receive from President John Adams was withheld by Secretary of State James Madison. Marbury sued to recover his commission.
McKinley's predecessor, Grover Cleaveland, refused to sign the treaty of annexation.
William Marbury, William Harper, Robert R. Hooe, and Dennis Ramsay were the plaintiffs (actually petitioners); US Secretary of State James Madison was the nominal respondent.William Marbury petitioned the US Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus (a judicial order commanding an official take, or refrain from taking, an action within his scope of responsibility) against US Secretary of State James Madison because Madison refused to deliver the justice of the peace commission former President John Adams granted Marbury. Marbury was unable to assume office without the sealed commission.Chief Justice John Marshall presided over the trial. Marshall, coincidentally, had been Secretary of State under President Adams, and was responsible for delivering Marbury's commission. Unfortunately, the administration changed before he had an opportunity to complete the assignment, and he assumed James Madison would complete the task for him.When the new President, Thomas Jefferson, discovered how John Adams had attempted to install 58 new judges immediately before leaving office, he decided to thwart as many of the appointments as possible. Marbury was one of a handful of men whose commissions were side-lined in this way.Case Citation:Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)For more information on Marbury v. Madison, see Related Links, below.
In 1839, the Whigs offered the vice-presidency to Webster to run with William Henry Harrison. but he refused. The Whigs won the election in 1840. William Henry Harrison was elected President with John Tyler his running mate.
They refuse to assassinate the president
Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)William Marbury took his case directly to the Supreme Court of the United States. Chief Justice Marshall ruled that the Supreme Court only had appellate jurisdiction over the case, and that Marbury would have to first file his complaint in a District Court, then appeal, if necessary.Marbury never appealed his case, most likely because the purpose of filing suit with the Supreme Court was to embarrass President Jefferson, not to secure his justice of the peace commission.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
No. President Roosevelt wrote a plan that would allow him to appoint one new justice for each current justice over the age of 70.5 years old, up to a maximum of six additional justices, which would expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine to fifteen. Congress understood the President's idea was unconstitutional, so they refused to pass the legislation. Eventually, the old members of the Supreme Court began retiring and passing away, so Roosevelt was able to appoint eight replacements without adding to the size of the Court.
president Jackson and the north.
A bear!
McKinley's predecessor, Grover Cleveland, had refused to sign the treaty for annexation submitted by a new government whose legality was questionable.
"Madison" was James Madison, Secretary of State under President Thomas Jefferson, who was named as the respondent in the case because his office (really Jefferson) refused to deliver some justice of the peace commissions to people John Adams appointed before leaving office.The official citation of the case is Marbury v. Madison,5 US 137 (1803)For more information, see Related Questions, below.