0
The region most resistant to Western Imperialism was Eastern Asia, with countries like Japan and Thailand(Siam) resisting Imperialism altogether, as well as all the fighting that had to be done to bring other nations in the region under control.
What else can I help you with?
What are the key differences between old imperialism and new imperialism in terms of their motivations, methods, and impacts on colonized regions?
Old imperialism, which occurred from the 15th to 19th centuries, was driven by the desire for resources, wealth, and power. It involved direct control and exploitation of colonies through military conquest. New imperialism, in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, focused on economic dominance and spreading Western culture and values. It used economic and political influence to control colonies. The impacts of old imperialism were often more brutal and exploitative, leading to widespread suffering and loss of culture for colonized regions. New imperialism had a more subtle impact, with economic exploitation and cultural assimilation causing long-term effects on colonized societies.
Does Hobson condone or condemn Western imperialism in Asia?
Hobson is generally critical of Western imperialism in Asia, viewing it as driven by economic interests rather than genuine altruism. He argues that imperialism exploits both the colonized nations and the working classes in the imperial powers. Instead of promoting progress, he believes that it perpetuates inequality and hinders true development. Overall, Hobson condemns the moral and ethical implications of imperialism, advocating for more equitable and just international relations.
How did European imperialism in India differ from European imperialism in china during the eighteen century?
European imperialism in India during the eighteenth century was characterized by direct colonial rule, particularly through the British East India Company, which established administrative control and significant cultural influence. In contrast, imperialism in China involved a series of unequal treaties and spheres of influence, primarily led by Britain and other Western powers, which maintained China's sovereignty while imposing trade concessions and extraterritorial rights. This resulted in a more fragmented approach in China, as opposed to the more centralized governance seen in India. Ultimately, while both were driven by economic interests, the methods and impacts of imperialism varied significantly between the two regions.
What of the following accurately describes a difference between European imperialism after the Industrial Revolution and earlier forms of imperialism?
European imperialism after the Industrial Revolution was more widespread than earlier forms of imperialism.
Was imperialism more negative or positive in India?
Imperialism was more negative in India because it destroyed India.
Why do you think most of Russia's population is west of the Ural mountains?
The western part of Russia has a milder climate, more fertile land for agriculture, and historically has been more connected to Europe for trade and cultural exchange. This has led to a higher population density in the western regions compared to the more remote and harsher eastern regions.
Did imperialism do more harm than good in Africa?
Yes, imperialism did do more harm than good in Afria.
What describes the difference between European imperialism after the industrial revolution and earlier forms of imperialism?
european Imperialism after the industrial revolution was more widespread than earlier forms of imperialism
How was 19th century imperialism different from older forms of imperialism?
Older forms of Imperialism were more concerned with establishing colonies in foreign territories.
Why did American industrialists support imperialism?
More land = more industry. Industrialists benefited greatly from the expansionism that occurred by American imperialism.
Is imperialism a political system?
Imperialism is a nation or country trying to get more land or spread its beliefs
What did the reelection of William McKinley seem to indicate about the American public's view of imperialism?
Americans were more imperialists and for imperialism more than they let on.
