It depends on what is determined to be a "large population". South Dakota has a larger population than North Dakota. The 2014 estimated population for South Dakota is 853,175. The 2014 estimated population for North Dakota is 739,842.
Both states have large metropolitan areas. The Sioux Empire metropolitan area of South Dakota includes South Dakota's largest city, Sioux Falls, and had an estimated population of 228,261 in the 2010 census. The Fargo-Moorhead metropolitan area includes Fargo, North Dakota and Moorhead, Minnesota, and had an estimated population of 208,777 in the 2010 census.
South Dakota has more population than North Dakota. The estimated population in South Dakota as of July 1, 2016 was 865,454 per the U.S. Census Bureau. The estimated population in North Dakota as of July 1, 2016 was 757,952 per the U.S. Census Bureau.
South Dakota has the larger population with 814,180 recorded in the 2010 US Census compared to 672,591 for North Dakota.
South Dakota has the larger population.
South Dakota is larger by 6,354 square miles.South Dakota, both in population and area.
South Dakota, with 814,180 recorded residents in the 2010 Census, has a larger population than North Dakota, with 672,591 residents.
South Dakota has a larger Native American population than Delaware. As of 2004: South Dakota: 62,858 Delaware: 3,066
South Carolina's population is over 5.5 times as great as South Dakota's.
No, North Dakota is smaller in both area and population.
South Dakota has a larger population density with more people per square mile compared to North Dakota. This is due to factors like larger urban areas and more developed infrastructure in South Dakota.
No. South Dakota is larger with a total of 77,116 square miles while North Dakota has a total of 70,698 square miles.
The North's population was larger
The North's population was much larger than the South's.
The North's population was much larger than the South's.
No, Nebraska is larger in both population and area.