car a for suddenly stopping i gess
In the UK it is the fault of the driver behind Same here in the USA
In the UK it is the fault of the driver behind Same here in the USA
Sorry but you are at fault in this situation even if a vehicle stops in front of you because in the eyes of the law you must leave enough room between you and the next vehicle to stop at all times. If not you are apt to be cited for following too close in a rear end collision.
If he pulled out in front of a car driving on the street and it struck his car, then he is at fault. If he was rear-ended by the car following, then the following driver is at fault.
Anyone who hits someone from behind is at fault. Even though it may seem like the driver in front shouldn't have done what they did.
When ever a person hits the car in front of them, they are found at fault. If you hit a car in the rear even though it stops short, you are at fault. You will probably get a ticket and your insurance will go up.
you are... by law, its tish enit
it is the truck that terned in frount of you criminal justice student
they are at fault because they should have pulled off to the side.
The vehicle that rear ends the vehicle in frontis usually but not always found at fault. This is because all states require that a driver be in control of his vehicle at all times. If you are certain that it was the fault of the guy in front,Stopping suddenly in front of another driver is a popular insurance scam techniqe,you will probably need witnesses to prove it.
Suddenly is an adverb and its comparative is formed by putting the word "more" in front of it.
You are.Added: The charge would probably be either 'Following Too Close' or 'Failure to Give Full Time and Attention.'