Who governs the people in a self-governed country?

Answer 1

Self-governed people are people who govern themselves. They decide in every aspect of their lives what they do and how they do it. If, of course, what they do injures a person, a victim, an accuser, who is willing to testify in court of their injuries, they can be held accountable for their actions. Otherwise, a self-governed individual can do anything that individual wants and no one can stop them. If one wants to drive down the road at night with ones lights off, they can as long as they do not cause injury to another individual. Such a self-governed individual governs him/herself. Their rights to this expression are infinite. One cannot write down the number of things a self-governed person can do because they are infinite. If a person wants to build a nuclear power plant in his/her backyard, as long as not one atom of nuclear waste lands on their neighbor or his/her property, that person can build and operate such a device. If a neighbor is smoking tobacco and the smoke drifts into a neighbors house, and that neighbor complains, the court system is there to make a determination as to injury, extent of that injury and just compensation for that injury. In the case of the U. S. constitution, a very few common rights were in fact written down. This was to make certain they were not taken away or denied, but again, to the extent to which individuals can express themselves is infinite. Thus, in the 9th amendment, the explanation is put forth that the few rights that were written down are not the only rights. There are in fact 'other rights'. They were smart not to attempt to write them all down because it is an impossibility to write down an infinite number or rights, or anything at all for that matter. Realistically, a person needs this infinite number of rights to fully express their pursuit of happiness. The law, or constitution in the case of the United States, is mainly an explanation to the peoples' employees as to the limitations they have to follow. They are instructed to make absolutely certain to respect certain specific rights and all rights in general of the self-governed and organize the business they do for the governed in a certain way. Therefore, public servants are not self-governed and in fact are heavily bound and restricted in what they can and cannot do. There are no such restrictions instructed to the self-governed body. They can do what ever they want as long as they do not injure another individual or group of individuals. With this, a certain mystery can be illuminated. The people have a right to 'bear arms'. This means 'to show'. This presupposes that if you have a written right to 'show your arms' you also have a right to carry and conceal said 'arms'. One cannot show they have a weapon unless it is already hid from view. Otherwise, a person would have to brandish the weapon. Indeed, brandishing a weapon would be a right but not one a person who always want to exercise. In the case of the U. S., the wide scope of freewill by the people has eroded. Since these self-governed allowed its employees to usurp their rights, it is commonly thought that in order to restore these rights, it will require a fight. Q. R. Thomson Jr. pixkaraoke@aol.com Self-governed people are people who govern themselves. They decide in every aspect of their lives what they do and how they do it. If, of course, what they do injures a person, a victim, an accuser, who is willing to testify in court of their injuries, they can be held accountable for their actions. Otherwise, a self-governed individual can do anything that individual wants and no one can stop them. If one wants to drive down the road at night with ones lights off, they can as long as they do not cause injury to another individual. Such a self-governed individual governs him/herself. Their rights to this expression are infinite. One cannot write down the number of things a self-governed person can do because they are infinite. If a person wants to build a nuclear power plant in his/her backyard, as long as not one atom of nuclear waste lands on their neighbor or his/her property, that person can build and operate such a device. If a neighbor is smoking tobacco and the smoke drifts into a neighbors house, and that neighbor complains, the court system is there to make a determination as to injury, extent of that injury and just compensation for that injury. In the case of the U. S. constitution, a very few common rights were in fact written down. This was to make certain they were not taken away or denied, but again, to the extent to which individuals can express themselves is infinite. Thus, in the 9th amendment, the explanation is put forth that the few rights that were written down are not the only rights. There are in fact 'other rights'. They were smart not to attempt to write them all down because it is an impossibility to write down an infinite number or rights, or anything at all for that matter. Realistically, a person needs this infinite number of rights to fully express their pursuit of happiness. The law, or constitution in the case of the United States, is mainly an explanation to the peoples' employees as to the limitations they have to follow. They are instructed to make absolutely certain to respect certain specific rights and all rights in general of the self-governed and organize the business they do for the governed in a certain way. Therefore, public servants are not self-governed and in fact are heavily bound and restricted in what they can and cannot do. There are no such restrictions instructed to the self-governed body. They can do what ever they want as long as they do not injure another individual or group of individuals. With this, a certain mystery can be illuminated. The people have a right to 'bear arms'. This means 'to show'. This presupposes that if you have a written right to 'show your arms' you also have a right to carry and conceal said 'arms'. One cannot show they have a weapon unless it is already hid from view. Otherwise, a person would have to brandish the weapon. Indeed, brandishing a weapon would be a right but not one a person who always want to exercise. In the case of the U. S., the wide scope of freewill by the people has eroded. Since these self-governed allowed its employees to usurp their rights, it is commonly thought that in order to restore these rights, it will require a fight. Q. R. Thomson Jr. pixkaraoke@aol.com

Answer 2

A: The people govern themselves.
A: The government elected by the
people.