Answer
Radio and Television
the internet and also radio and televisionRadio and TVPretty much anything that dispels what the government believes or anything that is blatantly offensive to religion and so on.PornographyRadio and TV
you worded that wrong...there arnt amendments is amendments...
19th Amendment
No, the 15th Amendment allowed all males to vote (the amendment was intended to allow African Americans to vote). Women could not vote (in most circumstances) until the 19th Amendment.
The fifth amendment protects many rights, but the most commonly known is the right of not incriminating yourself.
the internet and also radio and televisionRadio and TVPretty much anything that dispels what the government believes or anything that is blatantly offensive to religion and so on.PornographyRadio and TV
No. Movies are one of the most common media for the application of that amendment.
freedom of press
Which one of the following would most likely be violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause? A. A federal law prohibiting women from talking on cell phone while driving a mini van B. A state law prohibiting women from talking on cell phone while driving a mini van
Yes, they can most definitely get viruses.I have an iPod 2nd generation and my virus protection detected that it received a virus from the Internet.
Equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment,Your welcome you slacker!
separation of powers,independence of judiciary,recognition and protection of individual rights and freedom,institutions that support democracy,control of amendment of the constitution,review of the constitutionality of the law
It gave full citizenship to all people born in the Unites States. Because most African Americans were American born, they became full citizens. The amendment also required every state to grant its citizens "equal protection of the laws."
The sixteenth amendment is most closely related to the theme of economics.
The First Amendment
First Amendment rights are limited when a direct threat is posed either to an individual or to a group. It is a topic of controversy, since it is often difficult to tell what is a direct threat and what is simply a statement of opinion. In recent years, it has become a matter of national security according to some government officials, and the rights guaranteed under the first amendment have and most likely will continue to be pushed into the background when it is deemed "necessary."
Most likely yes. But it is illegal. You would be taking away their 4th Amendment Right of protection from unnecessary search and seizure. I hoped that this helped.