I would say a person who makes laws are the legislative people. By also the name of the congress.
By: Fatima Michael
F.Y.I Julius Michael s
daughter
The President is the Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces excluding the Navy (which is under the control of Congress). However, only Congress can declare war and approve of the sending of troops.
it an opportunity for a nation to show support for the men and women who make up the armed forces
I know about neurology and armed forces but this question does not make sense. Are there some words missing in the questions?
To reduct means to reduce, decrease, or make smaller. Therefore a reduction in armed forces would be a decrease in the numbers of people and machinery in the service of the armed forces. E.g. If an army is changed from 10,000 men to 5,000, there has been a reduction in the size of armed forces.
Probably to keep the power with the people... so they could vote for the individual with the most influence with our military.
Legislative has the power to make laws.
Armed forces veterans of the US should be honored for the sacrifices they make in guarding the US. Hundreds of thousands of them have died protecting American freedoms.
The power of making laws and then enforcing them is called jurisdiction.
The power of the executive branch is enforce the laws,the power of the legislative branch is to make laws, and the power of the judicial branch is to interpret the laws
The Constitution gives Congress the power to make laws for the District of Columbia.
The federal government has the power to discuss bills and proposals for new or altered laws. The government is given the most power in the country. The federal government has the power to discuss bills and proposals for new or altered laws. The government is given the most power in the country.
I would say no, but I am generally anti-union, and I think armed forces would be the very last thing I would want to see unionized. If there are any good arguments for unionization of armed forces I would like to hear them. By good I mean reasons why it would make the armed forces more effective, and not reasons why it would improve the lot of armed forces members. The armed forces of the Netherlands are unionized, and they are effective, but there must be some problems involved with unionization. I am generally pro-union, but I would have to say that a unionized armed services would be a horrible idea. The goals of a union clash directly with those of a national armed service, and I can't see how this would be a good idea for any country.