I believe it is the car making a left turn.
I was taught hat the left part of the intersection gets the right of way
If he was truly stationary and you hit him, you are probably at fault. If he was illegally going through the turn, he might be at fault.
If you hit a car from behind, you are going to be held to be at fault. If a car hits you from behind, they are going to be held at fault. Most jurisdictions consider hitting the back of a car prima facia evidence that you were following too closely. You could literally have six cars at fault in this case, each one for hitting the one in front of it.
Anyone who hits someone from behind is at fault. Even though it may seem like the driver in front shouldn't have done what they did.
To tell you the truth, You both are at fault. If you go to court, usually they will tell you that it's the person that didn't have the right - of - way's fault.
Sounds like worn out shock absorbers.
No, Unfortunetly not.
Without knowing full details, I gather from this question that Person A would be at fault, as their vehicle would have been the give way vehicle.
Personally, I think that it should be the fault of the driver going across the aisle, but other may think otherwise.
Where fault blocks collide into each other. The most prominent example of this are the Himalayan Mountains formed by the collision of the Indian plate and the Eurasian Plate making what is called a folded mountain.
you go to celadon city if you fly there you land in front of the p.c. go on the left side of the building keep on going until you see a back door of another building go in keep on walking until you reach the top of the building then go straght down then go in the door then you see a poke ball and there you have it you got a eevee.
From the above description, Car 2 would be at fault for disobeying the stop sign.
it is the result of a foot wall going down and a hanging wall going up