0
Who patrician elected by the plebeians to speak for their interests?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
There was no patrician elected by the plebeians to speak for their interests. There was a tribune who was elected by the plebeians to look after their interests, but he was a plebeian, not a patrician.
Actually...
P. Clodius Pulcher was a son of Appius Claudius, of the illustrious patrician Claudius gens. Pulcher was also an agent of Julius Caesar's. In order to get himself elected as Plebeian tribune, he was adopted into the plebeian family of Fontei in 59 BCE. He then went on to pass a number of popular laws and made Cicero's life very difficult.
So, to answer the original question, yes there was a patrician who was elected Plebeian tribune, but he needed to be adopted into a plebeian family first.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoThe Roman officials elected by the plebeians to look after their interests were the Tribunes, or more properly, Tribunes of the People, in order to distinguish them from the military tribunes. In ancient Rome ten tribunes were elected. The plebeians had demanded a say in the government and were ready to fight for it because they felt unfair that they had to fight for Rome and were not allowed to take part in the government. They were also angry because while they were fighting for rome their debts grew and by the end of a war they often found themselves bankrupt. In 494BC, the plebeians refused the military service and started a 'strike' on Mons Sacer (Holy Hill). The patricians gave up after a while and they created the status and office of the tribune. The tribunes had the right of veto, which meant that they could stop any law to pass by saying 'veto' (no).
Wiki User
∙ 11y agothey were called Tribunes
They were called Tribunes.
NEW RESPONDENT
"Tribunes of the Plebs"
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoThey were called the Tribunes but many times they were also called Tribune of the Plebs. This was to distinguish them from the military Tribunes.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoThe tribunes.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who spoke for the poor in rome?
No one actually spoke for the poor in Rome. The tribunes were initially supposed to speak for the plebeian class and look after their interests, and the plebeians were the poorer class of early Romans. However over time the financial condition of the plebeians changed and the political dealings of the tribunes changed leaving the very poor without a political voice.No one actually spoke for the poor in Rome. The tribunes were initially supposed to speak for the plebeian class and look after their interests, and the plebeians were the poorer class of early Romans. However over time the financial condition of the plebeians changed and the political dealings of the tribunes changed leaving the very poor without a political voice.No one actually spoke for the poor in Rome. The tribunes were initially supposed to speak for the plebeian class and look after their interests, and the plebeians were the poorer class of early Romans. However over time the financial condition of the plebeians changed and the political dealings of the tribunes changed leaving the very poor without a political voice.No one actually spoke for the poor in Rome. The tribunes were initially supposed to speak for the plebeian class and look after their interests, and the plebeians were the poorer class of early Romans. However over time the financial condition of the plebeians changed and the political dealings of the tribunes changed leaving the very poor without a political voice.No one actually spoke for the poor in Rome. The tribunes were initially supposed to speak for the plebeian class and look after their interests, and the plebeians were the poorer class of early Romans. However over time the financial condition of the plebeians changed and the political dealings of the tribunes changed leaving the very poor without a political voice.No one actually spoke for the poor in Rome. The tribunes were initially supposed to speak for the plebeian class and look after their interests, and the plebeians were the poorer class of early Romans. However over time the financial condition of the plebeians changed and the political dealings of the tribunes changed leaving the very poor without a political voice.No one actually spoke for the poor in Rome. The tribunes were initially supposed to speak for the plebeian class and look after their interests, and the plebeians were the poorer class of early Romans. However over time the financial condition of the plebeians changed and the political dealings of the tribunes changed leaving the very poor without a political voice.No one actually spoke for the poor in Rome. The tribunes were initially supposed to speak for the plebeian class and look after their interests, and the plebeians were the poorer class of early Romans. However over time the financial condition of the plebeians changed and the political dealings of the tribunes changed leaving the very poor without a political voice.No one actually spoke for the poor in Rome. The tribunes were initially supposed to speak for the plebeian class and look after their interests, and the plebeians were the poorer class of early Romans. However over time the financial condition of the plebeians changed and the political dealings of the tribunes changed leaving the very poor without a political voice.
What restrictions does Brutus put on Marc Antony speaking at the funeral?
In "Julius Caesar", Brutus tells Antony that he can't blame him and his co-conspirators for Caesar's death. He is told to say only the positive things he can remember about Caesar, and to let the plebeians know that the only way he is able to speak at the funeral is by Brutus' permission. Finally, Anthony can only speak from the platform where Brutus is to speak.
How was the roman republics government similar to today's government in the US?
They are not comparable. They are centuries apart and the societies are totally different. Rome was ruled by two annually elected consuls who at the beginning of the republic were quite like kings and whose power was undefined and therefore unlimited. The consuls acted as executives, legislators, judges and military commanders. The senate was not an elected body. The assembly of the people and the assembly of the soldiers did not elect representatives. Citizens voted on legislation themselves in these assemblies. The assemblies also elected the consuls and acted as courts of appeal during most of the republican period. At the beginning the patrician aristocracy had virtual monopoly over politics and the offices of state. Over time, the leaders of the plebeian movement were given access to the offices of state and were co-opted into a patrician-plebeian oligarchy. The plebeian mass had its own plebeian council separate from the mentioned assemblies. This was because it was set up as a break-away body during a plebeian rebellion against the state. It was integrated by allowing the votes of this council (plebiscites) to become laws binding on all citizens, including the patricians. The leasers of this council, the plebeian tribunes, became the main legislators. Officers of state were elected and got on with their jobs within their remit without supervision by a central body like a cabinet or a president.
What are roman plebeians?
All those who were not Patricians were Plebs (from which the Anglicised word Plebeian). The Patricians were descended from the early important families, usually claiming descent from a god or goddess. There were Plebeian branches of mainly Patrician families. It was a matter of descent and keeping the bloodline pure. There were rich and important Patricians (eg Sulla, Julius Caesar) and poor and unimportant Patricians. There were rich and important Plebs (eg Pompey, Cicero) and poor and unimportant Plebs. As a result of the civil wars and proscriptions of the 1st Century BCE, the Patricians ceased to be important numerically or politically, and it became an honorific but of no real significance.
Who did lord durham speak to and whom did he ignore?
Something to do with the French-Canadian Rebels in Lower Canada, who he talked to, but did not really add their interests or suggestions into his report, due to lord Durham being quite biased against the french.
Who spoke for the poor in rome?
No one actually spoke for the poor in Rome. The tribunes were initially supposed to speak for the plebeian class and look after their interests, and the plebeians were the poorer class of early Romans. However over time the financial condition of the plebeians changed and the political dealings of the tribunes changed leaving the very poor without a political voice.No one actually spoke for the poor in Rome. The tribunes were initially supposed to speak for the plebeian class and look after their interests, and the plebeians were the poorer class of early Romans. However over time the financial condition of the plebeians changed and the political dealings of the tribunes changed leaving the very poor without a political voice.No one actually spoke for the poor in Rome. The tribunes were initially supposed to speak for the plebeian class and look after their interests, and the plebeians were the poorer class of early Romans. However over time the financial condition of the plebeians changed and the political dealings of the tribunes changed leaving the very poor without a political voice.No one actually spoke for the poor in Rome. The tribunes were initially supposed to speak for the plebeian class and look after their interests, and the plebeians were the poorer class of early Romans. However over time the financial condition of the plebeians changed and the political dealings of the tribunes changed leaving the very poor without a political voice.No one actually spoke for the poor in Rome. The tribunes were initially supposed to speak for the plebeian class and look after their interests, and the plebeians were the poorer class of early Romans. However over time the financial condition of the plebeians changed and the political dealings of the tribunes changed leaving the very poor without a political voice.No one actually spoke for the poor in Rome. The tribunes were initially supposed to speak for the plebeian class and look after their interests, and the plebeians were the poorer class of early Romans. However over time the financial condition of the plebeians changed and the political dealings of the tribunes changed leaving the very poor without a political voice.No one actually spoke for the poor in Rome. The tribunes were initially supposed to speak for the plebeian class and look after their interests, and the plebeians were the poorer class of early Romans. However over time the financial condition of the plebeians changed and the political dealings of the tribunes changed leaving the very poor without a political voice.No one actually spoke for the poor in Rome. The tribunes were initially supposed to speak for the plebeian class and look after their interests, and the plebeians were the poorer class of early Romans. However over time the financial condition of the plebeians changed and the political dealings of the tribunes changed leaving the very poor without a political voice.No one actually spoke for the poor in Rome. The tribunes were initially supposed to speak for the plebeian class and look after their interests, and the plebeians were the poorer class of early Romans. However over time the financial condition of the plebeians changed and the political dealings of the tribunes changed leaving the very poor without a political voice.
The elected leaders in a representative government speak for the .?
The elected leaders in a representative government speak for the
Who is elected to speak for the people in government?
parliament
What did Roman representatives do?
A person who is elected by citizens to speak or act for them.
Who do the elected leaders in a representative government speak for?
people of that state
What people comprised the roman senate?
Mostly Patricians made up the Ancient Roman Senate, although there were ten tribunes to speak out for the Plebeians.
Why can the rich get us to vote and speak out against your own economic interests?
Because they just can...!#%&*%@)*&&%^) ^_^
The policy of speak softly and carry a big stick symbolizes America's interests in?
latin america
What is virtual representation?
In American History virtual representation is where Parliament had to represent all the people, but was rejected by the colonists and their delegates when Parliament began taxing them without their consent - remember: "no taxation without representation"
Why was the power to veto laws signifacant?
It is but one significant step in the process of protecting the rights of the people. In their zeal Congress has and will continue to invent laws that speak to popular concerns. If these laws abrogate or derogate the rights of the individual, then the President has no other authority but to veto. If the legislative body is able to pass the legislation after this, it is then up to the courts to protect the rights of the people. But at all times, it is up the individual to assert their rights when being encroached upon.
How was the roman republican different from the Estrcan rule?
The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.
Are politicians morally obligated to speak unequivocally or do they have a practicial right to br equivocal in order to be elected?
yes, because if they dont speak clear no one will understand them. then, who wants to vote for an undesicive canidate?
