The Supreme Court of the United States reviews laws that are relevant to cases before the Court to ensure their constitutionality, but does not scrutinize them for "fairness," as many people would define the concept.
Many laws are unfair to certain people or groups, or fail to protect their rights, but the judicial system is concerned only with whether a law adheres to constitutional principles. In order to overturn an "unfair" law, someone first has to convince the Court that the law directly violates a real person's constitutional rights and causes harm to that person.
P.S. If this question relates to homework or a test, then the "correct" answer is the US Supreme Court.
To protect the rights and freedoms of certain individuals and groups to ensure equality.
Protection against cruel and unusual punishment.
That was the fourteenth amendment.
Your mothèr
Some states or people (like Virginia's Patrick Henry) thought that the Constitution did not adequately protect individual citizens' rights. Therefore, a Bill of Rights was added so more states would ratify the Constitution, and the American people were afforded more protection than with the Constitution alone. The Bill of Rights added a significant number of rights and privileges not given to citizens under the Constitution alone.
protection against unreasonable search and seizure
No because, because aliens don't exist. Plus if they exist they would want aliens to have rights and humans to have rights so it is fair the constitution is about fairness. Or they would do experiments on them.
All of the Bill of Rights
All of the Bill of Rights
Of Individual Rights
Protection for citizens' rights(APEX)
All of the Bill of Rights
To protect the rights and freedoms of certain individuals and groups to ensure equality.
Civil and individual rights for people and the protection of the law of the land.
Protection for citizens' rights(APEX)
uncertainty, elective dictatorship, centralisation and weak protection of rights
Protection against cruel and unusual punishment.