0
The US Supreme Court heard Miranda v. Arizona, (1966) under its appellate jurisdiction (on appeal). Appellate courts are not "triers of fact," so they don't use a jury, but review the trial court decision in light of the question(s) raised on appeal. In other words, they only look at the specific issues the petitioner (the losing party who is appealing the case) claims resulted in an unfair decision. The US Supreme Court primarily considers cases involving constitutional rights.
The names of the jurors in the original trial are not available.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
The case that established rights that are read at the time of the arrest was vs Arizona?
Miranda v. Arizona
What are the results of Miranda v Arizona?
5-4 miranda wins
What Warren Court decision determined that people had to be informed of their rights before being questioned by police?
Miranda v. Arizona.
How do you cite US Supreme Court case in Blue Book Miranda v Arizona and in Westlaw?
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)
What was the date of Miranda v. Arizona case?
1966
Did the Miranda v Arizona established the supremacy clause?
No.
What is the name of the Supreme court case that changed law enforcement across the nation?
Miranda v. Arizona
Who were the parties in the US Supreme Court case Miranda v Arizona?
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)Ernesto Miranda was the plaintiff; the state of Arizona was the defendant. In a court case, the plaintiff/petitioner's name is always listed first, and the defendant/respondent's name is listed last.
Miranda v Arizona (1966)?
(1966) *Rights of the Accused
Which warren court decision determined that people hat to be informed of their rights before being questioned by the police?
Miranda v. Arizona
Which Supreme Court case established to that accused must be read their rights?
Miranda v. Arizona
What changed law enforcement around the country?
Miranda v. Arizona
