0
Who were some civil rights leaders who believed in violent protest?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Wiki User
∙ 14y agoMalcolm X
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What short term effect did sit in and other civil rights protest on life in the south?
Segregationists became more violent, businesses suffered from the mass actions, and civil rights leaders were arrested
What short time back did sit ins and other civil rights protest have on life in the south?
Segregationists became more violent, businesses suffered from the mass actions, and civil rights leaders were arrested
What is the civil rights organization that used non violent protest?
ilkeyou
What short-term effect did sit ins and other civil rights protesets have on life in the South?
Segregationists became more violent, businesses suffered from the mass actions, and civil rights leaders were arrested
Why did Martin Luther king's Chicago campaign fail?
Violent protest erupted in Chicago which caused civil unrest among AA leaders. With the KKK taking action against the civil rights leaders (bomb set off outside Jr's hotel room), the message of the campaign was overwhelmed with tension. During multiple arrests, policemen were violent. Violent towards children which became the main protesters. Children were the main protesters because the bread winners were the parents, children could miss a few days of school and not economically affect the family. Riots broke out and the Campaign failed and moved on.
Who were the civil rights leaders who believed people should protest without using violence?
Two famous civil rights leaders who believed people should protest without using violence were Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. They believed in using boycotts, passive resistance, and mass civil disobedience as forms of protest.
What short term effect did sit ins and other cilvil rights protest have on life the south?
Segregationists became more violent, businesses suffered from the mass actions, and civil rights leaders were arrested
What short term effect did sit in and other civil rights protest on life in the south?
Segregationists became more violent, businesses suffered from the mass actions, and civil rights leaders were arrested
What short time back did sit ins and other civil rights protest have on life in the south?
Segregationists became more violent, businesses suffered from the mass actions, and civil rights leaders were arrested
What short term effect did sit-ins and other civil rights protest have on life in the south ?
Segregationists became more violent, businesses suffered from the mass actions, and civil rights leaders were arrested
What is the civil rights organization that used non violent protest?
ilkeyou
What were the benefits of non-violent protest in the civil rights movement?
tt
What short-term effect did sit-ins and other civil rights protest have one life in the South?
Segregationists became more violent, businesses suffered from the mass actions, and civil rights leaders were arrested
Why did civil rights leaders want to protest on Birmingham?
Civil rights leaders want to protest on Birmingham because it was a KKK stronghold and Martin Luther King described it as America's worst city for racism.
Which of these was not a strategy of black civil rights leaders in the South from 1955 to 1965?
Violent resistance was not a strategy of black civil rights leaders in the South from 1955 to 1965.
What short-term effect did sit ins and other civil rights protesets have on life in the South?
Segregationists became more violent, businesses suffered from the mass actions, and civil rights leaders were arrested
Is the ability to protest important?
Yes. It is part of freedom of speech. It is a part of a free country's rights. It is part of democracy. It lets people or organisations or governments know what others think. A country that does not allow protest is not giving people civil rights. As long as protests are not violent, then people should be able to protest and should do so.
