0
Who would have been happier with their representations in the house small or large states?
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
In the House of Representatives, the number of delegates a state has is based on its population. The states with larger populations would, therefore, have greater representation and could be said to be happier with the system than states with smaller populations.
Mireille Rempel
Ressie Okuneva
Unlike the Senate where every state receives two representatives, House representation is based on state population. So, more populated states would receive more representatives than less populated states.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who would have been happier with their representation in the house small states or large states and why?
Unlike the Senate where every state receives two representatives, House representation is based on state population. So, more populated states would receive more representatives than less populated states.
What is the conflict between large states and small states?
how did did the American revilotion start
Is the house of representatives a linkage institution?
Given the large population of the U.S., the United States House of Representatives would not be considered a linkage institution. Political parties themselves are an example of linkage institutions.
What is the main idea of the Great Compromise?
The objective of the Great Compromise was to balance the influence of large states and small states (measured by population) in the federal government. The main idea was to create a bicameral (two-house) legislature; the lower house (House of Representatives) would have representation based on state populations and would originate all revenue bills, while the upper house (Senate) would have equal representation across all states.
How did the delegates to the convention resolve tensions between large and small states?
By making representation in the House of Representatives proportionate to population and representation in the Senate equal for each state
Who would have been happier with their representation in the house small states or large states and why?
Unlike the Senate where every state receives two representatives, House representation is based on state population. So, more populated states would receive more representatives than less populated states.
Who would have been happier with their representation in the senate small states or large states and why?
The physical size of states, small or large, was irrelevant.The size of their populations, however, determined their representation in the lower house of Congress. So states with larger populations are better represented in the House, where the number of representatives is apportioned by population, than in the Senate where each state is represented equally by two Senators.
Who was happier with their representation in the senate small states or large states?
The physical size of states, small or large, was irrelevant. The size of their populations, however, determined their representation in the lower house of Congress. So states with smaller populations are better represented in the Senate, where each state is represented equally by two Senators.
How did the Great Compromise please both small and large states?
The Great Compromise, or the Connecticut Compromise, pleased both the small states and the large states because it gave them both the representation they wanted. In the lower house (the House of Representatives), the small states got the proportional representation they wanted. In the upper house (the Senate), the large states got the equal representation they wanted with every state getting two senators.
Which of the houses in congress resulted in the appeasement of the large states?
The House of Representatives in Congress resulted in the appeasement of the large states. The number of representatives each state receives is determined by its population, which gives an advantage to larger states. This arrangement satisfies the large states and ensures their interests are represented in the legislature.
How did the large state and small states come to agree on two houses in Congress?
The "Great Compromise" between the large States and Small States was that there would be a Bicameral House. Witch meant that there will be two houses one for the large states and one for the small states. One of the houses was called the Senate and the Other House Of Representatives ( House Of Reps ). The Senate Was giving to the Small States witch was for the equal right they wanted . The House Of Reps Was giving to the big states with gave them what they wanted the votes by population especially with 3% of the slaves they had.
Did roger sherman propose a two-house legislature as a compromise between the small states and the large states?
Yes, he did.
How does the chart reflect the compromise between large and small states?
There is a house for both the small states and the big ones.
Why are there the same numbers in the US Senate for each State?
The bicameral Congress of the United States is a compromise between large and small states. Large states have the advantage in the House because each state's representation is roughly proportional to its population, and small states have the advantage in the Senate because every state has the same representation no matter how large or small it is.
Which house of congress would have been favored more by large states?
Well, if by large you mean in population, then they would favor the House of Representatives, where the members are determined by population size.
How was the problem between large states and small states resolved?
The Constitution solved the large state versus small state problem by establishing a bicameral legislature, with all states being equal in the higher house and small states having an edge in the lower house. It also helped by establishing the electoral college for electing presidents.
How did the Great Compromise create a legislature with representation which respected the population of large states and safe guarded and equalized the small states?
It proposed a bicameral legislative branch. The upper house, the senate, would have two representatives from each state. This satisfied the small states' plea for equal representation in Congress. The lower house, The House of Representatives, would please the large states in the way that state representation in the House was based off population. Larger states had more representation in the House, but representation was equal in the senate.
