0
Who was happier with their representation in the senate small states or large states?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
The physical size of states, small or large, was irrelevant. The size of their populations, however, determined their representation in the lower house of Congress. So states with smaller populations are better represented in the Senate, where each state is represented equally by two Senators.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Peyton Clark
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoHow many states had the smallest representation in the House of Representatives? one. Which state had the most Representatives? Virginia. How many representatives did Virginia have. ten. Who shouldhave been happier with their representation in the Senate, the small states or the large states? small states. Why would ...
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoGenerally, the rural states favor the Senate over the House.
In the Senate, all states are represented equally, thus states like Idaho (with a very small population) are represented equally with states like California (with a very large population).
In the House, states like California and New York have much more influence than states like Idaho and Kansas.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who would have been happier with their representation in the house small states or large states and why?
Unlike the Senate where every state receives two representatives, House representation is based on state population. So, more populated states would receive more representatives than less populated states.
Who would have been happier with their representation in the senate small states or large states and why?
The physical size of states, small or large, was irrelevant.The size of their populations, however, determined their representation in the lower house of Congress. So states with larger populations are better represented in the House, where the number of representatives is apportioned by population, than in the Senate where each state is represented equally by two Senators.
Why are there the same numbers in the US Senate for each State?
The bicameral Congress of the United States is a compromise between large and small states. Large states have the advantage in the House because each state's representation is roughly proportional to its population, and small states have the advantage in the Senate because every state has the same representation no matter how large or small it is.
Who would have been happier with their representations in the house small or large states?
In the House of Representatives, the number of delegates a state has is based on its population. The states with larger populations would, therefore, have greater representation and could be said to be happier with the system than states with smaller populations.
How did the Great Compromise create a legislature with representation which respected the population of large states and safe guarded and equalized the small states?
It proposed a bicameral legislative branch. The upper house, the senate, would have two representatives from each state. This satisfied the small states' plea for equal representation in Congress. The lower house, The House of Representatives, would please the large states in the way that state representation in the House was based off population. Larger states had more representation in the House, but representation was equal in the senate.
How did the Great Compromise please both small and large states?
The Great Compromise, or the Connecticut Compromise, pleased both the small states and the large states because it gave them both the representation they wanted. In the lower house (the House of Representatives), the small states got the proportional representation they wanted. In the upper house (the Senate), the large states got the equal representation they wanted with every state getting two senators.
What was the representation compromise?
The Representation Compromise gave both large states and small states the type of representation they asked for. This was done by changing the representation standards in the houses of Congress. Large states had wanted representation based on population. This standard was accepted in the House of Representatives, which allowed the number of representatives to be determined by state population. Smaller states wanted equal representation, despite population size. This was accepted by the Senate, in which all states have the same number of representatives.
What is the conflict between large states and small states?
how did did the American revilotion start
How did the delegates to the convention resolve tensions between large and small states?
By making representation in the House of Representatives proportionate to population and representation in the Senate equal for each state
Major topic of debate throughout the drafting process?
representation of large and small states
How would you describe the concept in a diagram for The Congress House of Representatives and US Senate?
a plan that provides for the fair representation of both small and large states.A plan that provides fair representation for both small and large states.
Why did some people want representation to be based on population?
With regard to representation in the House of Representatives, states are represented according to their populations. Representation in the Senate is based on 2 delegates per state, regardless of population.
