answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Answer 1

The land does not belong to any one people; just the ones who are here now. Control has flip flopped between the two peoples (or I should say, one people with two viewpoints) historically and, I suppose, will be a never ending battle. Imagine the country both sides could build if they were not trying to attain political turf!

On a personal side, I cannot imagine the politics being more important than living in peace and safety with one's family, honoring God.

To answer the question, though. Constant bombing into a country's territory leads the country to retaliate in order to preserve its citizens' safety. Israel definitely will not allow this in their territory and will not back off if provoked.

Answer 2

There are a few assumptions that the question makes that need to be qualified.

Firstly, while it is true that there is ample proof of a Palestinian presence in the land (as evidenced both by the living and by historical infrastructure), there is also evidence and ample proof of a Jewish/Israelite presence in the land (as evidenced by both the living - the small portion of endemically Palestinian Jews, and the numerous archeological and recent finds). Therefore, the idea implicit in the question, namely that the Israelis are aggressive in spite of proof is incorrect. There is proof on both sides.

Secondly, the word "aggressive" needs to be examined.

As for wars: In the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, the Arabs declared war on Israel. In 1956, Egypt nationalized the Suez Canal and cut off the Straits of Tiran. In 1967, although it was Israel that declared war on Egypt, it was Jordan and Syria that declared war on Israel. During the War Attrition, Egypt attacked Israeli military positions. In 1973, Syria and Egypt declared war on Israel. In 1981, Israel entered the Lebanese Civil War when rockets were being fired over the border. If anything, this shows continued restraint given that with the exception of the Six Day War of 1967 (which is considered by many to be a pre-emptive war) Israel has not fired the opening salvo of any international conflict, which would make them categorically not aggressive.

As for peace and armistices: Israel approved of every armistice put to it as it was winning engagements in 1949, 1956, 1967, and 1973. It also traded away the Sinai Peninsula to Egypt twice for peace and ceded control of Gaza and parts of the West Bank to the Palestinian Authority for peace. This is not aggressive behavior.

When all of the terms have been properly examined, the question as posed is nonsensical.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why Israel was so aggressive when there is a ample proof that the land is of Palestine?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why are there conflicts in Palestine?

The Muslims and Jews both claim that Palestine is their land at that they have been living there for thousands of years. The Muslims do not have any proof of their claim, but the Jews do.


Who the inventor of bullet proof glass?

israel gutierrez


Is Israel part of Palestine?

There are two operative parts of this question which must be discussed before any viable answer can be given.1) What is Palestine? Palestine, prior to 1949, was never used in the context of describing an actual nation or state. It was a regional term that came from the Roman Province Syria-Palaestina. From the 1500s-1919, Palestine was part of several different Ottoman governates like the Vilayet of Beirut, the Vilayet of Damascus and the Mutasaffirat of Jerusalem. The British Mandate of Palestine was the way that the British merely decided to redraw the lines. While there is certainly a legitimate Arab nationalist aspiration to create a Palestinian Arab state, there never was such a state in the past.2) What does "take" mean? Take in this context traditionally means to forcibly assume control of something that was previously controlled by someone else. Since the British, a foreign power, were in control of Palestine, not the indigenous Arabs, the Israelis could not take Palestine from the Arabs. This is similar to how the United States annexing Texas is not construed as taking over Mexican land. Texas and the United States were states separate from the Mexican population of Texas even though the majority of Texans at the time of annexation were Mexicans. Israelis fought the British for the control of a region of land. That land just happened to be called Palestine because of the way the map was drawn.Result:As this explains, Israel did acquire the territory of the British Mandate of Palestine as the result of a war that was declared against it. However, this does not mean that Jews took Palestine if we hold to the definitions that we have already reasonably established. It bears mentioning that from its inception, Israel has sought to establish peaceful relations with everyone else. Unfortunately, it has had the need to defend its civilians almost constantly, all the while maintaining the strongest efforts to mitigate collateral harm.


Can cps take your children if you move to another state espesially if there accusations are pretty much nothing?

CPS can intervene if they have concerns about the safety and well-being of the children, regardless of the state they are in. If there are allegations made against you, it is important to address them and work with CPS to resolve any issues to prevent removal of your children. Moving to another state does not necessarily protect you from CPS involvement if there are valid concerns.


Can Vacu-Statin cure aggressive Cancer?

Vacu-Statin is a holistic supplement which is made from bindweed. It has been studied and purported to be beneficial in the treatment of cancer. There is however, no verifiable proof that it can cure aggressive cancer.


Has Israel ever lost a war or military conflict?

Not in this era, no. The proof that Israel has prevailed through all hostilities since 1948 is the plain fact that in 2012, the nation still exists.


What archaeological proof has been found that the Jewish temple was on the temple mount?

Plenty, although the objective of the excavations was not to 'prove' anything, but to expand the ample historical record of the temple period with knowledge of its artifacts.


Was Tibni king of Judah or Israel?

King Tibni was a good king. For proof download the watchtower CD Rome and search him up.- By Nathan


What is assertive?

It means Aggressive self-assurance. Example: there was no reason behind his Assertiveness.


What does it mean to dream about a brown snake that is aggressive?

The snake represents a problem or perhaps a person who is aggressive and seems to threaten you. A brown snake would be difficult to see against dry ground or rocks, suggesting that you have difficulty seeing exactly what this person is doing. Note that the dream depicts your own suspicions and discomfort; it does not provide any proof that the situation or person actually is aggressive or dangerous.


What is the Value of 1948 Israeli Proof set?

Israel did not produce a proof set in 1948. Indeed, only one coin dated 5708 (the equivalent to 1948 AD) was produced (a 25 mil coin), and it was not made as a proof. If you meant 1984 (Israeli date 5744), according to the Standard Catalog of WOrld Coins, the piefort proof set is valued at about US$10.00, as is the mint set.


Is there any historical proof of the Hebrew exodus from Egypt?

No, however, there is a reference to Israel in the hieroglyphics. One possible reason for this lack of proof is that the Ancient Egyptians didn't record their losses in writing. Another is that the story may not have happened the way it is recorded in the text.