Most likely it's due to that so many of them initially arrived in the US to go to college, and then stay here for the opportunities. Compare that to latinos, who may come for a farm-working or restaurant job; they're much closer, so there's greater likelihood they would travel for such work. (No disrespect to latinos intended; many are educated, it's just that the uneducated ones arrive as well.) Most asians are relatively recent immigrants; the logic that those who are willing to make the long journey are also more likely to be disciplined workers to get ahead in life. European Americans have been here for awhile, so the "motivated immigrant" logic is less likely to apply.
It's striking: here, the Indian Americans are consistently among the most educated people I know. Go to India, and you'll see widespread illiteracy. Immigration has a way of sorting people.
Hard work.
During the writing of the constitution, the population of the United States was around 2.5 million people. The racial and ethnic census at the time was predominantly White, with Black enslaved individuals forming a significant minority. Regarding religious statistics, the population was predominantly Protestant, with smaller numbers of Catholics and other denominations. In terms of landownership, it was skewed towards large landowners, with smaller farmers and tenants making up a significant portion of the population.
Not necessarily. The UK Census (not sample) collects descriptive statistics such as level of education, ethnic identity, religious beliefs and so on.
asians
Asians
yes
Asians are currently the smallest ethnic group in South Africa. The largest is the Bantu or the Blacks.
Mandarin Chinese are the largest ethnic group
The Census
Their age, gender, and ethnic origin.
The Census
The Census