A. Why Humans ( People ) are Called Resources? Prior to humans being called resources, they were either called slaves, servants, labourers, workers, employees, staff, personnel etc depending on their "ownership" or relationship with the other party desirous of their economic contribution and the socio-politico order of the day. With the industrial revolution and the rise of economics theory and thinkers, Adam Smith's production formula of Land, Labour and Capital became popular. The mobilisation of large numbers of people became the job of establishment departments or labour departments, later known as personnel (NOT personal) departments, and now HR Departments. In the academic world, the study of humans took a scientific approach, and social studies became accepted as Social Sciences, and the study of human behaviour, in groups and as individuals, became known as behaviourial sciences. "Industrial psychologists" also manage to find berths in Personnel Departments and HR Departments of large corporations and multi-nationals. Scientific management led to the question of "what is there to manage?", and the answer was (and still is?) as follows; 1. cost 2. time 3. resources Resources can be broken down as follows; 1. financial 2. human 3. materials / equipment / technology (knowledge) Thus giving rise to the phrase human resources! B. What is the Difference Between Human and Resources? 21st century thinking is beginning to give more credit to humans, viewing them (us!) as more than a production unit that is capable of innovation and creativity, essential ingredients in the knowledge economy. The fall of communism and the dominance of capitalism and rising consumerism, plus globalisation and centralisation (polarisation?) of production capacities to achieve massive economies of scale, and competition to secure energy sources, has only shifted our views of humans slightly ie from pure (human) resources to humans as a source of knowledge. Hence the "what's to manage" thingy looks like following; 1. cost 2. time 3. resources with resources categorised as follows; 1. financial (capital) 2. human knowledge (capital) 3. materials / technology / energy thus the present buzz words "human capital" as a key competitive edge / leverage in a global and knowledge-driven world economy. Industrial psychologists and social engineers are kept busy at finding ways of "humaneering" the corporate culture and the work place (family place?). So people, Got it? If not, see your Chief Learning Officer!
I have learn the meaning of human resource management, importance of management, the difference between HR & HRM, importance of planning, need of HR and reasons as to why humans are referred to as resources........
Administrative theory focuses on humans and their behavior instead of worker efficiency. Science theory focuses on the efficiency of the workforce.
human resources have limitations of things they can do and can't like every other department in a organisations, but HR are different as they are there for the well being of the humans involved in the company,
they both have humans in them, but in my personal opinion you should do your homework instead of using the computer.
Human capital management is the concept of humans being resources in a given situation. The people working should be managed in a fashion that allows maximum production as well as efficiency.
Natural resources are those that you can find out in nature. Manmade resources are resources that must be manufactured or made by humans.
I have learn the meaning of human resource management, importance of management, the difference between HR & HRM, importance of planning, need of HR and reasons as to why humans are referred to as resources........
Renewable resources can be created artificially by mankind by using energy of some kind. Nonrenewable resources cannot be recreated in any way by humans
humans talk, phones answer.
In the spaceship framework, humans share the limited resoursed of the Earth; in the lifeboat framework, there are enough resources for some and not others. -apex :)
Yes, there is a difference between natural resources and resources. Natural resources refer to the materials or substances that exist in the natural environment and are used by humans for various purposes, such as oil, water, minerals, and forests. Resources, on the other hand, can refer to any type of asset or supply that is valuable or useful to individuals or organizations, including natural resources, but also including other types of assets such as human resources, financial resources, and technological resources.
(Apex) In the spaceship framework, humans share the limited resources of the Earth; in the lifeboat framework, there are enough resources for some and not others.
1-2% the same difference between female humans and female chimpanzes
Humans are more complex organisms.
Cats do not have appendix and humans do.
the difference is the human one is for humans and the chicken one is for chickens. We humans eat chicken.....".........'........'..........lawls
Some of our resources come naturally, and some have to be made by humans. Here is an example.The moon is a natural satellite.The other satellites (that aren't moons) are not natural, because they are man - made.