You said it right there, they are transversely mounted. The engine is made to bolt up to a front wheel drive transmission and all accesories are driven differently.
Front-wheel-drive in most cases, All-wheel-drive in some cases, Rear-wheel-drive in very few cases. AWD (e.g. Mitsu EVO, etc) RWD (e.g. NSX, yes mid-engined, but still transverse)
No. They couldn't be more different. The ES 300 is a front drive, transversely mounted V6 engine, the GS 300 is a rear drive inline 6.
No. They couldn't be more different. The ES 300 is a front drive, transversely mounted V6 engine, the GS 300 is a rear drive inline 6.
Unless it's been very seriously modified, it's a mid-engine, transversely mounted transaxle, and rear wheel drive with open differential.
8. Mounted in pairs to drive four contra-rotating propellers.
The engines were powered by boilers
A transaxle is a transmission and differential (drive axle) assembly all in one. Old rear engine, rear wheel drive VW's and most Porsches (911, 912, 914) have RWD transaxles, and most modern cars with transverse mounted (sideways) engines have FWD transaxles.
It is someone who can drive a Truck Mounted Forklift, this is the forklift trucks you see mounted on the back of Heavy Goods Vehicles and you need a specific licence to drive one.
Anything is possible with time, money and some serious modification. Front wheel drive vehicles are not designed to accept the dimensions of the parts that are needed for rear wheel drive. The engine compartment is designed to accept transverse (sideways) mounted engines not inline engines, there's no transmission and driveshaft tunnel, a custom driveshaft would likely be required, there's no clearance for a rear differential, etc. Converting a front wheel drive vehicle to rear wheel drive would probably cost considerably more than buying a rear wheel drive vehicle.
mount point
mount point.. i think i am not fully sure.
true