Want this question answered?
be testable
conducting experiment
That depends on the result of the experiment. The experiment is a way to test a hypothesis, and it's completely fine if the experiment disproves the hypothesis. Ideally, though, the experiment will support the hypothesis.
By testing your results, and explain in your conclusion what went wrong
identify the problem and what you want to try to prove or disprove. or something like that :D
not only to prove a hypothesis, but disprove it as well
as many as needed to prove or disprove it
To prove the hypothesis. To disprove the hypothesis.
Scientists were expected to conduct experiments to prove / disprove their hypothesis and theories.
An experiment can prove or disprove a hypothesis.
be testable
conducting experiment
Scientists first create an hypothesis. They develop methods to prove their hypothesis. In order for other scientists to replicate the findings and prove or disprove another scientist's outcome, the original scientist MUST describe the methods used and the findings.
Your hypothesis is supported by the data. You cannot prove a hypothesis because somebody may do some other experiments and disprove it eventually. You can only disprove a hypothesis or indicate that it is supported by the data.
That depends on the result of the experiment. The experiment is a way to test a hypothesis, and it's completely fine if the experiment disproves the hypothesis. Ideally, though, the experiment will support the hypothesis.
It is important to be able to test the hypothesis because testing your hypothesis is how you prove or disprove your theories. If it is disproved then you can change your hypothesis.
Other virus researchers would be likely to try and prove or disprove these theories.