answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Other virus researchers would be likely to try and prove or disprove these theories.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Suppose that a scientist proposes a hypothesis about how newly discovered virus affects humansOther virus researchers wouldb likely?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

When a scientist finds that a hypothesis is wrong the scientist usually?

A hypothesis doesn't necessarily need to be correct. After a scientist has conducted an experiment and discovered that their hypothesis is incorrect, they still have gained the knowledge and the results from their experiment---as well as the correct answer, in some cases. They can use the results from the experiment that tested the original hypothesis to form a new experiment.


A scientist makes a claim of having discovered an eternal life potionIs this a testable hypothesis?

The hypothesis would have to be phrased in such a way as to allow for experimenting, but yes.


What is the name of the scientist who discovered how many atoms are found in 1 mole of any element?

Avogadro. Also, he made a Hypothesis.


Does a scientist consider a hypothesis to be a fact?

Scientist consider hypothesis to be an educated guess on what they are studying. If that scientist researches and experiments more, he will see if his hypothesis is true or false.


What options does a scientist have if experiment does not support hypothesis?

a scientist can do another experiment or change their hypothesis.


The scientist Wegener's time should have accepted his hypothesis?

Yes, because he is the only scientist that discovered the CONTINENTAL DRIFT and studied all about FEATURES,FOSSILS AND EVIDENCE OF CLIMATE CHANGE when 1900.


After a hypothesis what do scienrist do?

the scientist proposed a theory after hypothesis.


What does a scientist do if hypothsis is not supported?

make a new hypothesis. if not the scientist continues believing in their hypothesis without any proof and becomes a mad scientist


What do scientist do when their data does not support their hypothesis?

Discard or change the hypothesis.


What should a scientist do if a hypothesis is supported?

If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step


What should a scientist do if a hypothesis is not supported?

If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step


What are the three steps scientist take to evaluate a scientist explanations?

1. Experiment 2.hypothesis 3. Checking hypothesis