answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Because he never did any kind of discrimanation between his people or religions. He even removed Jazia which was a tax paid by the hindus for pilgrimages. Many trees were planted and wells were dug out for the welfare of the people.He didnot even forced Jodhabai her wife to convert from Hindu to Muslims. He started a new religion Din-E-lllahi which was the religion of the God. No body was allowed to kill the animals, discriminate between religions, colour etc. in this religion. However this religion not had much followers so it was decayed until the death of Akbar.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why can it be said that akbar was a tolerant ruler?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Was Akbar Muslim or non-Muslim?

Akbar was a Muslim, and he made India tolerant to all religions.


Which of the three mughal rulers tolerated all religions?

Humayun, Akbar, Jahangir,Shah Jahan mughal emperors who tolerated all religions. Akbar is also known as the tolerant ruler. He never forced anyone in his kingdom to change his religion. He even removed Jazia (tax paid by the hindus for pilgrimage centres).


Who was the ruler of most of India?

Akbar


What Muslim leader in India had the most tolerant view in religion?

Akbar


In the movie jodhaa akbar cwho was the ruler of mughal kingdom before akbar?

humayun


Who became ruler after akbar?

His eldest son Jahangir succeeded Akbar (1605-1627).


Who was the mughal ruler known for tolerance?

akbar


Who is the Muslim ruler founded patna bihar?

Akbar


Which mughal ruler introduced rose to India?

akbar


Who was the most competent Mughal ruler?

akbar the great


Who was consider by many to be a great Mogul ruler?

akbar


Is Akbar a good ruler or a bad ruler?

Akbar is actually a Mughal Emperor who was The ruler in India during the early 1700s. Before Akbar's rule Mughal era was not well known. Akbar was very good with keeping perfect political relations. This ruler singlehandedly almost unfied India in all its multi-ethinicity. However he was still an invader from the west. Hence it is quite ambiguious where he lies on terms of being a good or bad ruler. But in comparison to his grandson aurangazeb who desecrated andd destroyed temples, Akbar was a very good ruler. So yea make your choice.