Because he never did any kind of discrimanation between his people or religions. He even removed Jazia which was a tax paid by the hindus for pilgrimages. Many trees were planted and wells were dug out for the welfare of the people.He didnot even forced Jodhabai her wife to convert from Hindu to Muslims. He started a new religion Din-E-lllahi which was the religion of the God. No body was allowed to kill the animals, discriminate between religions, colour etc. in this religion. However this religion not had much followers so it was decayed until the death of Akbar.
Humayun, Akbar, Jahangir,Shah Jahan mughal emperors who tolerated all religions. Akbar is also known as the tolerant ruler. He never forced anyone in his kingdom to change his religion. He even removed Jazia (tax paid by the hindus for pilgrimage centres).
humayun
Akbar
akbar
Akbar is actually a Mughal Emperor who was The ruler in India during the early 1700s. Before Akbar's rule Mughal era was not well known. Akbar was very good with keeping perfect political relations. This ruler singlehandedly almost unfied India in all its multi-ethinicity. However he was still an invader from the west. Hence it is quite ambiguious where he lies on terms of being a good or bad ruler. But in comparison to his grandson aurangazeb who desecrated andd destroyed temples, Akbar was a very good ruler. So yea make your choice.
Akbar was a Muslim, and he made India tolerant to all religions.
Humayun, Akbar, Jahangir,Shah Jahan mughal emperors who tolerated all religions. Akbar is also known as the tolerant ruler. He never forced anyone in his kingdom to change his religion. He even removed Jazia (tax paid by the hindus for pilgrimage centres).
Akbar
Akbar
humayun
His eldest son Jahangir succeeded Akbar (1605-1627).
akbar
Akbar
akbar
akbar the great
akbar
Akbar is actually a Mughal Emperor who was The ruler in India during the early 1700s. Before Akbar's rule Mughal era was not well known. Akbar was very good with keeping perfect political relations. This ruler singlehandedly almost unfied India in all its multi-ethinicity. However he was still an invader from the west. Hence it is quite ambiguious where he lies on terms of being a good or bad ruler. But in comparison to his grandson aurangazeb who desecrated andd destroyed temples, Akbar was a very good ruler. So yea make your choice.