It was originally built as a semi-fortified Catholic mission station called the Mission San Antonio de Valero in 1724 as part of a string of such missions built by the Spanish Empire in the province of Tejas (Texas). The mission was designed as a religious community for monks and priests as well as a school and administrative center for the local natives and settlers. The missions was abandoned by the church in 1793 and passed into secular hands before the famous battle in 1836.
People visit the Alamo today to see a piece of history. The Alamo has several tour guides that explain the Alamo's past.
Mexico did not want Texas part of there contry
Mexico made slavery illegal @around 1830, white people did not like it and joined u.s. to continue slavery.
The Alamo in San Antonio was a strategic defensive position. Also, Mexican General Santa Ana believed wiping out the defenders would stop the rebellion against Mexico.
It's what won us Texas as a state to the USA! U Texans have got to remember it!
Davy Crockett
There are several weaknesses. First, it was an exposed position. Second, its small physical size. Third, it had adobe walls.
San Antonio, Texas, but the Alamo was not in any position to defend the city (which Mexican troops occupied as soon as they arrived) as the question imples.
There is no evidence that slavery even as a remote property issue would have been a motivational factor for the unique subset of defenders. They wanted to defend the Alamo.
Not necessarily. There were other forts in Texas besides the Alamo. [Fort Defiance, for example. ] The Alamo was one Texas fort, but not all Texas forts were the Alamo.
1836
They were trying to defend their town and their homes.
Sam Houston wasn't at the Alamo when it fell to Santa Anna.
Davy Crockett
He helped Jim Bowie defend the Alamo
February 24 to March 6, 1836
There are several weaknesses. First, it was an exposed position. Second, its small physical size. Third, it had adobe walls.
San Antonio, Texas, but the Alamo was not in any position to defend the city (which Mexican troops occupied as soon as they arrived) as the question imples.
There is no evidence that slavery even as a remote property issue would have been a motivational factor for the unique subset of defenders. They wanted to defend the Alamo.
it was the china because of it fast discoverd
the united states had the most SOLDIERS however, the united states was not conected to texas at that time.
The main disadvantage, and the fatal one, was that they had not enough men to adequately defend the long perimeter of the Alamo. Against a smaller army (or an enemy commander who would not have so callously sacrificed his own) the Alamo might not have fallen, but as it was they were badly outnumbered. Sheer weight of numbers decided the battle.