Want this question answered?
To strike against; to attack; to assail., To displease; to make angry; to affront., To be offensive to; to harm; to pain; to annoy; as, strong light offends the eye; to offend the conscience., To transgress; to violate; to sin against., To oppose or obstruct in duty; to cause to stumble; to cause to sin or to fall.
No, there must remain alternatives for those who oppose war as a matter of conscience.
Abolitionists used religion to justify their cause by emphasizing Christian values such as compassion, equality, and dignity for all individuals, regardless of race. They argued that slavery was incompatible with these beliefs and that it went against the teachings of love and justice in the Bible. Many abolitionists were motivated by their faith to fight against slavery and believed it was their moral duty to work towards its abolition.
No you need the same game to play against someone
Lee called slavery "An unmixed evil", did not believe in it. Duty, and honor to one's self and country were his major beliefs.
Jackson's big Southern problem was with South Carolina which led a sort of rebellion against the tariff which protected Northern industry at the expense of southern cotton farming. These people proposed a doctrine of nullification which would allow any state to nullify any federal law which they found to be objectionable. Closely related to that idea was the idea that if things got too bad, states could secede from the union and become independent nations. Jackson believed that it was his duty as president to oppose nullification and certainly to disallow succession. Interestingly, in the background was the issue of slavery. Southern states believed that it the federal government could impose damaging tariffs against their strong objections, that in due time it could abolish slavery. Jackson was not a threat to abolish slavery since he had over a 100 of his own.
If you refuse to go to jury duty, you may be held in contempt of court. This could result in legal consequences such as fines or even arrest. It is important to comply with a jury duty summons to avoid these repercussions.
: The war was as much about State Rights as about slavery. : For men like Robert E. Lee the case was not so much the political question of whether to support or oppose slavery or whether to support or oppose secession but a case of duty to their country or duty to their state. It was the states that created the Union. Additionally, to be fair, one must place their thoughts as if they were raised and lived in the USA of 1860. Not easy to do. For Robert E. Lee his list of duties ran in this order. Duty to Family, duty to Virginia, duty the Union. When Virginia left the Union for Lee, who thought himself first and foremost a Virginian, there was no question about whether or not he would fight for or against Virgina. He would always choose Virginia first. The question was would Virginia remain neutral or join the Confederacy? Either way Lee would always follow Virginia. Joseph E. Johnston was the same. Joe didn't support slavery, never owned a slave (though his father and brothers did), was friends with a slave in his youth but he to thought of himself as a Virginian first and an American second. I bring him up for the reason that a conversation between his wife Lydia and General in Chief of the United States Winfield Scott shows the mind of many Southern officers in the United States Army. "Get him to stay with us" Scott said to her. "We will never disturb him in any way." "My husband cannot stay in an army which is about to invade his native country" she replied "Then let him leave our army," Scott said. "but do not let him join theirs." "This is all very fine." she said. "but how is Joe Johnston to live? He has no private fortune. And no profession, or no profession but that of arms." To this Scott had not answer. One of Winfield's four options presented to President Lincoln was to "let our sisters go". He expressed great fear for the people of the South in event of a war. : I agree. Robert E. Lee did not fight for the south because of slavery, but because he was too loyal to his family, friends, and home state to fight against them.
No. It is a privilege, not a right or a duty.
No. but you can play call of duty blacks online on a PC
Daniel Foster has written: 'Our nation's sins and the Christian's duty' -- subject(s): Slavery
no