0
The very technical ruling in this case was that Dred Scott, a slave, was not a full citizen of the United States under the Constitution, therefore he did not have any right to access to the federal courts.
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoBecause Scott had spent some time (under his previous master) on free soil, where he would have been granted his freedom automatically, if he had asked for it.
He did not do so until he was back in slave country - a situation that the local judges had never dealt with before.
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoBecause Scott had spent some time (under his previous master) on free soil, where he would have been granted his freedom automatically, if he had asked for it.
He did not do so until he was back in slave country - a situation that the local judges had never dealt with before.
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoDred Scott had been the slave of a US Army surgeon and the surgeon died in a free state. Because he had no living master and was located in a free state, he believed that he was now free and not subject to be returned to his late owner's wife.
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoDred Scott was with his master when the master died and this happened in a free state. Instead of being returned to the master's wife as "property" Scott sued in that he believed he was no longer a slave.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoDred Scott, was a slave who mainly followed his owner to free states like Utah and his master died, eventually he thought he should be free so he sued the government.
Anonymous
Dred Scott and his wife Harriet had lived in Illinois and in Wisconsin Territory, both free domains. In Wisconsin Territory, the Missouri Compromise had outlawed slavery. It also allowed anyone, any color, to sue for wrongful enslavement, and that any person taken to a free territory automatically became free and could not be re-enslaved upon returning to a slave state. Dred and Harriet filed for freedom based on these 2 statutes, lost but got re-trial, won but lost again on appeal. They went to federal court in May 1854 and lost. They appealed the case to the US Supreme Court, but lost again in March 1857. They finally won freedom when the owner’s 2nd husband sold them to the original owner’s son, who would then free them in May 1857. Dred Scott died in Sept. 1858.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How was James armistead freed from slavery?
James Armistead was freed from slavery from the Virgina Council because of his work in during the American Revolution.
Why wasn't Dred Scott free?
Dred Scott Was not Freed Because of the severe Racism and discrimination against slaves. Most slave owners did their best to make slaves miserable. this was not in scotts case though. He was also not freed because the chief justice that oversaw scotts hearing was Proslavery which completley put out scotts chances of being freed. Taney Decreed that the Missouri compromise was unconstitutional, Scott was to stay a slave, Scott was not a U.S. citizen, and he could not sue BECAUSE he wasn't a U.S. citizen.
What was the Constitutional amendment that freed the slaves?
The 13th amendment to the US Constitution abolished slavery in the United States and its territories.
How did the Emancipation Proclomation benefit the Union?
It kept Britain and France from aiding the Confederates - it would have made them look pro-slavery themselves.
What did lincoln hope for and fight for in the civil war?
Lincoln hoped for slavery to end. Actually, he didn't want to be involved in it and hoped for it not to be in the new territories. He believed all men are created equal. The Gettysburg Address stated this and freed the slaves.
Why Did dred Scott argue that he should be freed?
he onced lived in the North where slavery was prohibited
Why did bred Scott argue that he should be freed from slavory?
Dred Scott argued that he should be freed from slavery because his owner had taken him to live in free territories, which he believed should make him a free man. He claimed that his residency in these free territories should have granted him his freedom according to the principles of "once free, always free."
Why did Jefferson Davis support slavery?
Jefferson Davis did support slavery but also thought it should end eventually and the slaves should be freed. He did feel that they should be educated and then freed.
What do you call someone who has been freed from slavery?
A person who has been freed from slavery is typically referred to as a freed or emancipated individual.
Should escaped slaves be freed or returned to their owners?
Escaped slaves should be freed from bondage as slavery is unethical and goes against the principles of human rights and freedom. It is important to prioritize the well-being and autonomy of individuals over the property rights of slave owners.
When did he escape from slavery?
he was freed in 1838
How was James armistead freed from slavery?
James Armistead was freed from slavery from the Virgina Council because of his work in during the American Revolution.
Who was dred Scott and what was the dred Scott decision?
Dred Scott is a slave and sued his slave owner that if his in the north his freed from slavery. dred scott decision is when they said the Dred is just a slave and they are not citizen had no rights to sue their slave owners. this led to continue the civil wars against the north and the south
What did the supreme court in its decision in the dred Scott case?
The Supreme Court eventually decided to give Dred Scott his freedom. They made that decision because they thought that it would end the huge slavery crisis. A few weeks after Dred Scott was freed, he sadly died. :(
Why were the slaves freed?
The Civil War was over slavery. The North was against it and the south was for slavery. The North won so all the slaves were freed.
One who has been freed from slavery is?
emancipated
What is a person freed from slavery called?
Freedman
