answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

ancient Rome had originally fought as part of a phalanx similar to the Greek version. A evolution of change began when the Roams found out at the River Allia, this formation could be subject to an envelope tactic which enabled the attackers to penetrate the Roman flanks. In time the phalanx was therefore discarded into the legion.

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

Rome dropped the Greek phalanx and adopted the manipular formation of the Samnites in the 4th century BC

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why did ancient Rome decide to abandon the Greek phalanx battle formation?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is the Battle formation used by ancient Spartans?

Phalanx Formation


What type of battle stratiegies did ancient Greece use?

the battle formation that ancient Greece used was called the phalanx formation.


What is a Phalanx in ancient Greece?

A massed fighting formation of armoured infantry.


What battle formation produced the powerful fighting force in the ancient world?

Phalanx


What is a phalanx?

A phalanx was a military formation of packed ranks of infantry locked into formation with spears providing offensive and defensive capability, and shields providing lateral and overhead protection.


What battle formation produced the most powerful fighting force in the ancient world?

Phalanx


What advantage did Philips soldiers have?

Their battle formation - the phalanx was a massed formation which broke less cohesive ranks. Their spears were twice as long as other Greek spears which added to the phalanx's power.


What type of terrain was the best for the Greek battle formation of the phalanx?

Flat land allowed it to keep close formation and change its frontal direction easily, however that also favoured enemy cavalry, so the phalanx needed its own cavalry support to protect it, and also th stop enemy light infantry from attacking from all sides.


When the hoplites or infantry soldiers went into battle the marched shoulder to shoulder in a formation called a?

The hoplites fought in the phalanx formation.


What has been the controversy regarding the two types of ancient Greek phalanx formations?

The ancient Greek phalanx battle formations have been the subject of debates both in ancient history and among today's historians. In fact, it is still not clear whether the so called deep phalanx formation was a better tactic then the so called "shallow" formation. In one instance a phalanx formation composed of veterans, may have only needed ranks four rows deep. In the case of new, untested soldiers, the depth of the phalanx formation was at times 12, 16, and 32 ranks deep. Some historians believe the deeper the group, the more power it had. It had extra soldiers in the rear ranks to step forward to replenish lost troops on the front rows. This is contrasted by others who claim that extra deep ranks were redundant inasmuch as the front ranks were responsible for either the victory or the defeat in a battle.


What was the classic phalanx battle formation under Alexander the Great?

The phalanx was a formation of warriors 16-deep where the three front ranks' pikes provided a mass of points which attackers would impale themselves. The other ranks rested their pikes on the shoulders in front and these helped to deflect missiles. Cavalry on the flanks attacked any attempt to outflank the phalanx, and light infantry provided a link between the cavalry and the phalanx.


When was the phalanx invented?

The phalanx was invented by the ancient Greeks, but is seen most when Alexander The Great was in power. Alexander improved the phalanx by adding the pike (an 18 foot spear) to it increasing its effectiveness in battle.