Because the British wanted to rule over the colonist and the colonist did not want to be ruled over by the British. Or for that matter they did not want to be ruled over by anybody because they wanted to be a free country.
The colonists were angry with the British government because they were heavily taxed to pay for the Seven Years' War, and they had no representation in the government so they could not have a word about this.
This question is best answered by first looking at conflicts between Europeans and Native Americans in a broader scope than just English colonists and Native Americans. Without exception, people from Europe arrived in the Western Hemisphere to live, farm and mine.
This automatically meant that the colonists were living on and taking land that previously belonged to Native Americans.
At any given time in the Western Hemisphere, conflicts between Native American did occur. However, these internal conflicts rarely had the affect of permanently losing Native American territorial customs to a totally foreign group of new people, that being European settlers and the armed forces that came with them.
Whether it was English colonists, French or Spanish ones, conflicts arose because the Europeans, for lack of a better term, simply stole the territories of Native Americans.
With that said, taking over new territories by new people has been part of human history for thousands of years. It has been a fact in human behavior that this happened and in terms of realpolitik we can see it
in Europe where Crimea has changed from Ukraine control to Russian control.
Some problems included the colonists being taxed unfairly by the British. The Proclamatin of 1763 angered the colonists greatly as well.
taxes, and tea trade problems. and etc....
Well, there was so much friction that it led to the Revolutionary War between the colonists and the British.
Colonist
The outcome was that the colinist won. The outcome was that the colinist won.
One effect of the new British taxes on colonist were protests.
Never did the British parliament, [until the passage of the Stamp Act] think of imposing.
How did these aggravate the problems between the colonies and British? Could the views of the radical colonists be reconciled with those of the British parliament and king? Cite specific events and issues to illustrate the two different" world views "of the British and colonists.because they treat people wrong
British wanted to help pay for the french and Indian war and the colonist all didn't like the taxes and didn't agree
Jigerboo!
Jigerboo!
Jigerboo!
There was no war with the Puritans. They followed a doctrine of peace and made peace with the Natives they met. If you are asking about the British colonist there were problems from the very start. You have to realize that not all colonist were Puritan's There was only one colony of the sect.
Colonist
Settlement limits
The colonist WERE British, so they wrote a letter to the king ( the Declaration of Independence) to tell him what the problems were.
It was the Colonist V.S. the British Soldiers. It was the Colonist V.S. the British Soldiers.
It was a war between the British, and the Dutch South African colonist.
The outcome was that the colinist won. The outcome was that the colinist won.
Washington's defeat of the Hessian soldiers at the Battle of Trenton.