0
Why did most scientist reject wegeners theory for nearly half the centry?
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why did most scientists reject wegener theory for nearly a half century?
They rejected Wegener's theory for half a century because he could not identify the cause of continental drift.
What might cause a scientists to reject a theory?
that thars not enuph proph
Why did most scientists reject Wegner theory for nearly a half century?
They rejected Wenger's theory for half a century because he didn't have the evidence to prove his theory No, He did have evidence to prove his theory, they just did not believe him- TheSystem because of their lack of knowledge of the Earth He actually had evidence, but it was actually because the hypothesis interferred with their own hypothesis about how mountains form.
Why did many scientists reject Wagner's hypothesis?
He could not prove how they moved he died before they considered his hypothesis
Why did Saint Augustine reject astrology?
St. Augustine was the most influential of these critic of astrology, writing against "vulgar astrology" and condemning its practitioners as frauds and impostors. He did not deny that celestial bodies had some influence, but rejected the determinism inherent in astrological predictions concerning fate.
What is nearly same as deny?
reject
What is a Valid reason why a scientist might reject a scientific theory?
its to old
What is a valid reason a scientist might reject a scientific theory?
It is to old
Why might a scientist reject a scientific theory?
there might not be enough proof
What does it a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?
the hypothesis has not been proven wrong.
What is one way a scientist reject a experiment?
It can be rejected if there is no control variable.
What do scientist do after they have tested a hypothesis?
Depending on the results of that test, either accept or reject that hypothesis.
Why did scientist reject wegener's hypothesis?
because he didn't know how the tectonic plates/continents moved
What does it mean when a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means that the experiment is consistent with the hypothesis. It adds to the credibility of the hypothesis.
What dose it mean if a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
What dose it mean if a scientist fail to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
Why did scientist reject weeners hypothesis?
Because the caculated strength of rock made such movement of earth's crust seemed impossible.
