Want this question answered?
First of all, because of a labor shortage throughout the Americas, owners really had no choice but to use imported labor from the Atlantic Slave Trade; there was no other viable source of labor. Roughly 6% of enslaved Africans wound up in the southern colonies and states. Second, most owners convinced themselves and others that the enslaved Africans were inferior people, suitable only for forced labor and placed on Earth by God for the use of white people; the Biblical statement about mankind's dominion over animals was sometimes invoked. There was a a lot of variation in how owners felt about and dealt with their slaves. The harshness of treatment varied by region and by plantation. There were plantations where brutality was exceedingly rare and slaves were treated like a community of resident workers, although for no wages and no freedom to depart. A slave was an expensive piece of property in that era, and it makes little sense that some slaveowners maimed or killed some of their valuable workers; they were willing to throw away their money to make their brutal statement of the superiority/inferiority issue.
yes
it made plantation owners buy and use more slaves.
In Africa, there would be wars, the winners would take prisoners of war and would sell them to European traders who would sell them in the Americas to plantation owners who would use the slaves as free labor
The south used slave labor because the land was nice and lush. which means in needs croped and harvested extra help was needed.
Farming and other hard labor.
It was simple greed. Slave labor is the cheapest kind. Slave owners can get very rich through the use of slave labor.
Use slave labor to take over Northern industries...jrc
things for their plantation
European plantation owners wanted to use enslaved Africans as workers due to their cheap labor costs, physical endurance for field work, and perceived immunity to tropical diseases compared to indigenous populations. This exploitation of enslaved Africans allowed plantation owners to maximize their profits in the burgeoning industries of sugar, tobacco, and cotton.
After the slaves were freed white plantation owners had to find new ways to work their land. They typically used three methods: sharecropping tenant farming and wage labor. Sharecropping was a common practice in the South. It involved a system where a tenant farmer usually a former slave would work the land in exchange for a share of the crops proceeds at the end of the harvest. The plantation owner would provide the land tools and supplies while the tenant farmer handled the labor. Tenant farming was similar to sharecropping but the tenant farmer was required to pay rent for the use of the land. This allowed plantation owners to maintain control of their land but it often left the tenant farmer in a difficult financial position. The third option was wage labor which involved hiring workers to work the land. This was the most expensive option but it allowed plantation owners to maintain more control over the land and the labor. In the end white plantation owners had to adjust their methods of working the land after the slaves were freed. Sharecropping tenant farming and wage labor were the three primary options available to them and each had its own pros and cons.
No, Maryland didn't have slave labor. There was discrimination, but no slavery.
Enslaved Africans were brought to Cuba to be sold to American plantation owners. These plantation owners would use the slaves to farm their land.
slaves, crops
Tools to use against slaves.
The civil war affected the plantation owners in a major way. They could no longer use unpaid slave labor to plant and harvest their crops. They lost a great deal of their wealth since they could no longer afford to bring crops to market. The plantation owners wife now had to be responsible for cooking, child-rearing, and cleaning that was previously done by the slaves. They were mostly unprepared for the job.
First of all, because of a labor shortage throughout the Americas, owners really had no choice but to use imported labor from the Atlantic Slave Trade; there was no other viable source of labor. Roughly 6% of enslaved Africans wound up in the southern colonies and states. Second, most owners convinced themselves and others that the enslaved Africans were inferior people, suitable only for forced labor and placed on Earth by God for the use of white people; the Biblical statement about mankind's dominion over animals was sometimes invoked. There was a a lot of variation in how owners felt about and dealt with their slaves. The harshness of treatment varied by region and by plantation. There were plantations where brutality was exceedingly rare and slaves were treated like a community of resident workers, although for no wages and no freedom to depart. A slave was an expensive piece of property in that era, and it makes little sense that some slaveowners maimed or killed some of their valuable workers; they were willing to throw away their money to make their brutal statement of the superiority/inferiority issue.