0
Why did the Committee to Test the Separate Cars Act want to take their case to the Supreme Court?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
They wanted to challenge the constitutionality of the Louisiana state law under the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Explanation
In Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896), the New Orleans' Citizens' Committee deliberately staged a confrontation over the Louisiana Separate Cars Act of 1890 (Act 111) in order to bring a "test case" before the US Supreme Court to challenge the constitutionality of the state law.
The Separate Cars Act provided that African-Americans and whites must be segregated into separate train cars, which the Committee hoped would be found unconstitutional under the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments. The basis for their optimism was a recent federal ruling declaring segregation in interstate travel unconstitutional.
Unfortunately, the Court declined to extend this protection to the States, and the Louisiana law was upheld.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoThey wanted the Court to declare the Separate Cars Act unconstitutional
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What US Supreme Court case made segregation legal and what case overturned that precedent?
Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896), sanctioned legal segregation by upholding a Louisiana Law that required separate train cars for African-American and Caucasian travelers. The Court reasoned that segregation was constitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment as long as the facilities and accommodations were equal. The Supreme Court's decision in Plessy is the origin of the "separate but equal" doctrine that legally allowed states to pass racist Jim Crow laws for almost 60 years.Brown v. Board of Education, (1954) specifically addressed the negative affects of segregation in public education, holding "separate but equal is inherently unequal," and also unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause. Brown was an important milestone in the civil rights movement.Case Citations:Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896)Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954)
Why did Homer Plessy challenge a Louisiana law in 1892?
In 1892 Homer Plessy rode in a whites only railroad car. He was brought before the courts and argued that the lawwas unconstitutional. In 1896 the supreme court expressed a new legal document endorsing "seperate, but equal."
What case said racial segregation in public facilities was legal?
You are probably thinking of the 1898 Supreme Court case "Plessy vs. Ferguson." It involved a light-skinned black man named Homer Plessy who sat in the "whites only" section of a Louisiana train. He was arrested, and became determined to challenge what he saw as an unjust law. Sad to say, the Supreme Court upheld the segregation of railway cars (and everything else): as long as the facilities were equal for blacks and whites, it was okay to keep the two races separate. Of course, facilities were not equal for blacks-- whites had better schools, better housing, more opportunities to use libraries and other public buildings, etc. But the court had codified segregation, and the decision would not be overturned till 1954's "Brown vs. Board of Education."
What color were Homer Adolph Plessy's parents?
Homer A. Plessy was the petitioner in the landmark US Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896) that validated the "separate but equal" doctrine and lead to generations of oppressive Jim Crow laws in the United States.Plessy was of mixed heritage, but was seven-eighths white. Both of Plessy's parents were listed as free persons of color, so it's impossible to tell which ancestors in the lineage on each side were African-American.Plessy had very light skin and admitted he could "pass" as white, although he had enough African traits to be able to challenge the Louisiana Separate Cars Act, 1890 legislation that enforced segregation in intrastate railway travel. Plessy belonged to a group called the "Citizens' Committee" that deliberately provoked subtle confrontation over the law.Lead Counsel for the case, Albion Tourgee, purposely chose Plessy for his light complexion, but wasn't simply trying to elevate the status of lighter-skinned African-Americans, as some of his contemporary darker-skinned peers criticized him of doing. Tourgee was a brilliant strategist who wanted equality for all African-Americans.
Why does Canada drive on the right side of the road?
In Canada there is a yellow line in the middle of the road to separate the lanes. It is on your left side so drivers stay on your right to avoid collision from the cars on the other lane.
Which supreme court decision made this claim in response to a state requiring separate train cars for white and black people?
plessy v. Ferguson
Why did the committee to test the separate cars act choose a man with no children to test their case?
They knew that challenging the law was dangerous
What US Supreme Court decision encouraged the growth of segregation in the south?
Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896)The Supreme Court held a Louisiana state law requiring African-Americans and whites travel in separate railroad cars was constitutional, as long as the facilities provided were separate but equal (the opinion actually says, "equal but separate"). The decision legally sanctioned racist and segregationist policies already in effect, particularly in the South, and encouraged the adoption of discriminatory Jim Crow laws.
Why did the committee to Test the Separate Cars Act choose a man who looked white to test their case?
They wanted Plessy to challenge the scientific racists
Which court will hear a case involving a dispute between the united States and japan on the price of cars sent to america?
The court that will hear a case involving a dispute between the United States and Japan on the price of cars sent to America is the Supreme Court.
Was Plessy v Ferguson a federal or state case?
Plessy v Ferguson was a federal case that reached the United States Supreme Court. It involved a challenge to a Louisiana state law that required separate railroad cars for black and white passengers. The Supreme Court's decision in Plessy v Ferguson in 1896 established the "separate but equal" doctrine, which allowed racial segregation.
How do you use Plessy v. Ferguson in a sentence?
Plessy v. Ferguson was a significant Supreme Court case that upheld racial segregation in public facilities, establishing the "separate but equal" doctrine. This case is often used as an example of a legal precedent that perpetuated racial discrimination and was later overturned by Brown v. Board of Education.
This was a U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the legality of racial segregation so long as facilities were "separate but equal."?
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896)The Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896) was a landmark case that upheld a Louisiana statute allowing for "equal but separate" facilities. The facilities in question were railway cars which were divided by partition and offered the same accommodations to white and "colored" races. It was found that these provisions were not in conflict with the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
Who were the two parties of the Brown v Board of Education?
Homer A. Plessy (petitioner) was citizen of New Orleans whose heritage was part African-American. He helped challenge and was arrested for violating the Louisiana Separate Car Act of 1890 that required separate railroad cars for white and non-white travelers.John Howard Ferguson (respondent) was the judge in Orleans Parish, Louisiana, who heard the case of Homer A. Plessy under the Separate Car Act of 1890. Judge Ferguson had previously ruled that the act did not apply to interstate travel. Because he was named in the petition to the Louisiana Supreme Court, Ferguson was the appellant of record in the US Supreme Court case.Case Citation:Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896)
What strike involved the manufacture of railroad cars in Chicago Illinois?
The Pullman Strike, after which the Illinois Supreme Court required George Pullman to end his ownership of the "company town" of Pullman, Illinois.
Where did plessy versus Ferguson happen?
Plessy v. Ferguson originated in New Orleans, Louisiana, when a group of African-American professionals, the Citizens' Committee of New Orleans, decided to challenge the constitutionality of segregation laws. In this case, Homer Plessy deliberately violated the Louisiana Separate Car Act of 1890 (Act 111), that required whites and non-whites to ride in separate railway cars when traveling intrastate.Plessy, an "Octroon" in 19th-century Louisiana parlance (one-eighth African-American), was arrested after refusing to leave the whites-only car while traveling from New Orleans to Covington, St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana on June 7, 1892. He was tried in Orleans Parrish, New Orleans, in Judge John Ferguson's court, the following month.Plessy was found guilty, but appealed his case through the Louisiana state courts and the US Supreme Court on the grounds that the Louisiana law was unconstitutional under the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments. His loss in the Supreme Court affirmed the "separate but equal" doctrine that was used to justify segregation nationwide. The decision was finally overturned in the Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education, (1954).Case Citation:Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Who won the Plessy v. Ferguson case?
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896)John Howard Ferguson was the judge in Orleans Parish, Louisiana, who heard the case of Homer A. Plessy under the Separate Car Act of 1890. Judge Ferguson had previously ruled that the act did not apply to interstate travel. Because he was named in the petition to the Louisiana Supreme Court, Ferguson was the appellant of record in the US Supreme Court case.(see related question)
