The same reason the current "New World" attacks, I mean brings "Freedom" to other countries in the world, Natural Resources, and in those days, Gold and other natural items (beaver pellets, etc. ) of trade was the currency, and the "New World" was an abundant resource for these. Now a days luckily we have fake money otherwise gold would still be the basis for many wars, now it's just oil.
So they could have more money coming into their government.
The English did not want to compete with the Dutch in the colonies.
The wanted to be diverse population and more equality between rich and poor.
Oppression by the British government was what drove the colonist to revolt. They wanted to make sure that the new government was not oppressive. They had more confidence that their own state government would be more responsive and easier to keep in check than would the federal government so they sought to limit the powers of the federal government.
they were willing to face the dangers of the new world so they could become somewhat known and to please their rulers and also to get riches that they expected to be in the new world
No, they were to restrict the colonies from selling/buying goods to / from other countries. The English didn't want France, Spain, or the Dutch to profit from the items or raw materials from the colonies and they wanted to keep the colonies from buying from them too.
The English did not want to compete with the Dutch in the colonies.
They both live in the North America . And They both want colonies in America . And The English and Spanish colonies were established for complete different reasons.
Religious purposes.
The English did not want to compete with the Dutch in the colonies.
They didn't expect to have a a representative government in the colonies... but they did want one.
They wanted a government free from tyranny and with more freedoms such as religious and a little voice in the government.
He wanted the colonies to have a strong government, but was tried of leading.
when do want it to start
The wanted to be diverse population and more equality between rich and poor.
There was not a goal of 13 colonies. In fact, there were 32 colonies total. During the last two decades of the 16th century the English Crown granted various proprietors and chartered companies authority to establish colonies in America. These led to the creation of 12 colonies and in 1730 a group of government sponsored trustees established Georgia. Except for New Hampshire and Nova Scotia, both of which were started under direct supervision of the crown, these colonies were private ventures and not supervised by the English. Between 1624-1729 the majority of the colonies were made into royal provinces and this included the private colonies.
Oppression by the British government was what drove the colonist to revolt. They wanted to make sure that the new government was not oppressive. They had more confidence that their own state government would be more responsive and easier to keep in check than would the federal government so they sought to limit the powers of the federal government.
There was not a goal of 13 colonies. In fact, there were 32 colonies total. During the last two decades of the 16th century the English Crown granted various proprietors and chartered companies authority to establish colonies in America. These led to the creation of 12 colonies and in 1730 a group of government sponsored trustees established Georgia. Except for New Hampshire and Nova Scotia, both of which were started under direct supervision of the crown, these colonies were private ventures and not supervised by the English. Between 1624-1729 the majority of the colonies were made into royal provinces and this included the private colonies.