To force them into integration with white society.
They thought it was for their own good. The government told everyone they were saving the children from neglect. The English people thought they were doing the right thing.
They took them because they wanted them to live like the white people. But they forced them to try to do what the white people wanted them to do, they treated them like a slave.
To take them to school to learn and teach them the posh manners
Guilds also used the money to take care of members and their families who were sick and unable to work
Guilds also used the money to take care of members and their families who were sick and unable to work
It would destroy Jewish families, Gypsy families, people with homosextuals, and other types of people because the Nazi would murder them, take them to concentration camps, and tear families apart from one another... somtimes forever.
The main role of children in ancient Rome was not to embarrass their families. (kids will be kids, no matter at what time in history they lived) However Roman children were taught to be good citizens, putting public service and duty before self interests. They were also taught to take pride in their families and their ancestors.The main role of children in ancient Rome was not to embarrass their families. (kids will be kids, no matter at what time in history they lived) However Roman children were taught to be good citizens, putting public service and duty before self interests. They were also taught to take pride in their families and their ancestors.The main role of children in ancient Rome was not to embarrass their families. (kids will be kids, no matter at what time in history they lived) However Roman children were taught to be good citizens, putting public service and duty before self interests. They were also taught to take pride in their families and their ancestors.The main role of children in ancient Rome was not to embarrass their families. (kids will be kids, no matter at what time in history they lived) However Roman children were taught to be good citizens, putting public service and duty before self interests. They were also taught to take pride in their families and their ancestors.The main role of children in ancient Rome was not to embarrass their families. (kids will be kids, no matter at what time in history they lived) However Roman children were taught to be good citizens, putting public service and duty before self interests. They were also taught to take pride in their families and their ancestors.The main role of children in ancient Rome was not to embarrass their families. (kids will be kids, no matter at what time in history they lived) However Roman children were taught to be good citizens, putting public service and duty before self interests. They were also taught to take pride in their families and their ancestors.The main role of children in ancient Rome was not to embarrass their families. (kids will be kids, no matter at what time in history they lived) However Roman children were taught to be good citizens, putting public service and duty before self interests. They were also taught to take pride in their families and their ancestors.The main role of children in ancient Rome was not to embarrass their families. (kids will be kids, no matter at what time in history they lived) However Roman children were taught to be good citizens, putting public service and duty before self interests. They were also taught to take pride in their families and their ancestors.The main role of children in ancient Rome was not to embarrass their families. (kids will be kids, no matter at what time in history they lived) However Roman children were taught to be good citizens, putting public service and duty before self interests. They were also taught to take pride in their families and their ancestors.
Quite simply, Europeans had never come across the aboriginal people before. Australia is a relatively young country, having only been discovered by Europeans in the 1600s, and neither the Portuguese nor the Dutch showed sufficient interest in the continent to take the time to get to know the people. The Europeans perceived themselves as superior to the aboriginal people.
Cause the children that were taken were part Aboriginal, part European (English) so the government thought they had the right to take the children.
Yes they were forced to take on western culture in the period between 1905 and 1969. Most Aboriginal children were forcibly taken off their parents and family and placed into homes with Australians/Europeans and forced to take on the western culture.
No, but in many jurisdictions families with children will take priority over single or couple families. But families with a disabled or elderly person (even if that person is alone) also take priority.
Because the English early settlers wanted aboriginal people to die out so they took all the lighter skinned aboriginals from their families and raised them as white kids so that the aboriginal breed would soon be gone.
Yes; many of them do that.
yes
There a lot of families and children who live on the street or live in very terrible homes. Joseph Kony sends his soldiers out at night to take the children in Uganda.
the people who lived there
you dont feel that is when you call your states children and families department and take action and get away from the monsters abuseibg you
Chlidren were forced to work in the 1800's because they were poor, and they needed to take care of their families
no
Not really, but some are very protective of small children.