Want this question answered?
That would defeat the entire purpose of the Free Exercise Clause. The Supreme Court would almost certainly agree that certain actions (human sacrifice, for example) would remain illegal even if the accused claimed such acts were part of religious practices. However, if we limit protection to only specific religions, there is no longer any value in having the protection at all.
Only their God, or Supreme Being (if they believe in one) can pass that judgment on them. Only if they feel they should be.
anti-federalists
Anti-Federalists
You should not sacrifice yourself or your values for anyone else. You are accountable for your actions. Certain situations require sacrifices such as parents with their children.
establish network security procedures establish emergency response provide user education
The Anti-Federalists were also worried that the original text of the Constitution did not contain a bill of rights. They wanted guaranteed protection for certain basic liberties, such as freedom of speech and trial by jury.
India should take certain actions. Swatchh India Abhiyaan is one to make India secure nation.
Two actions that should be taken when hazardous material has been identified are first, to make sure the substance is properly contained. Second, use proper safety precautions around the material, such as wearing a breathing mask and eye protection.
Your mothèr
They say that the role of government should only be significant if actions harm others.
You should always use protection.