Want this question answered?
Colonists in the sons of liberty harassed customs workers, stamp agents and sometimes royal governors
The British Parliament were imposing very high taxes on all products that were being shipped to the colonies. The colonists had no way to voice their objections within the British government because there was no one to represent them. This caused the colonists to increase their desire to gain their independence.
The French and Indian War was expensive. To help pay for it, Britain began taxing American colonists. In 1764, the British Parliament passed the Sugar Act, which levied taxes on molasses and sugar. Some colonists objected to this tax. Because they did not have a representative in Parliament, they did not believe that Britain had a right to tax them. "No taxation without representation!" was the cry. Because the sugar tax was collected at ports, it was easily circumvented. Indirect taxes such as these were also much less visible to the consumer.
Andrew Carnegie objected to US intervention in Cuba.
a. nullified colonial property rights to Florida b. contained no provisions for representative government c. raised taxes d. established French as the official language of Canada
The colonists objected to taxation by Parliament because they were not represented. They had sought representation in Parliament for years without success. It became clear that they were being treated like a conquered people rather than citizens of Britain.
American colonists objected to British taxes because the colonists had no vote on the taxes and no representation in the British parliament. The colonists' catchphrase for protests was "taxation without representation", because they were being taxed without representation in the parliament and that's why they were mad.
The American colonists objected to British taxes because they were being forced to pay money to the Crown, and at the same time had no say in the British Parliament. This is where the phrase "no taxation without representation" comes from.
The colonists objected to the tax laws and tariffs that were being imposed upon them by Parliament. Prior to the French and Indian War, Britain had allowed the colonies few taxes and more self governance. They viewed the acts as the attempted subjugation of the colonies by King George and Parliament. They also objected to being forced to pay taxes when they had no representation in Parliament.
Colonists in the sons of liberty harassed customs workers, stamp agents and sometimes royal governors
The American colonists objected to British taxes because they were being forced to pay money to the Crown, and at the same time had no say in the British Parliament. This is where the phrase "no taxation without representation" comes from.
The American colonists objected to British taxes because they were being forced to pay money to the Crown, and at the same time had no say in the British Parliament. This is where the phrase "no taxation without representation" comes from.
Parliament presented Charles I with the Petition of Rights because they objected to his actions.
The British Parliament were imposing very high taxes on all products that were being shipped to the colonies. The colonists had no way to voice their objections within the British government because there was no one to represent them. This caused the colonists to increase their desire to gain their independence.
Citizens objected to military conscription.
Actually, they weren't. The difference was that the Tea Act was written in a way to try to look like something other than a tax, but also so if the colonists accepted it, the British Parliament would argue that they had accepted the power of Parliament to tax them without representation. Colonists who understood the world situation also objected to the tax because it was a move by Parliament to bail out the British East India Company by raising money from the colonists. Giant corporations were regarded as oppressing the colonists along with the Crown, so fighting the tea tax was a fight against two evils at once.
Because the colonists objected to the monopoly on tea and the import duty. Because the colonists did not like Britain put a tax on tea.