Want this question answered?
because during that time period it was widely aknowledged that they were chosen by God to rule, due to this they percieved themselves to far superior to everyone else, subsequently the were able to condone what they did.
Because they only have to answer to themselves when it comes to their actions. There is no check and balance system. Left unchecked or unchallenged will result in absolute dictatorship.
Not everyone will agree. If you believe Bonifacio's actions were tresonous, yes his execution was justified. If you believe his actions were not treasonous, then his execution was not justified.
No -- and no one should believe in such obscure ideas of absolute authority.
he doesnt
Murder can be justified in cases such as the preservation of human life or in the case of self defence. This is very controversial as many people believe that how can some one judge what is justified to what is not.
Martin Luther objected to the materiality of the Roman Catholic Church. It had evolved into a moneymaking, rather than simply spiritual organization. He didn't believe the Pope could absolve sin any other way than with ablution. Instead, indulges were being given to absolve sins in exchange for a fee.
I believe not.
They should have absolute power.
Absolute monarchy
You get the answer by making believe the minus-sign isn't there. Now you can find the absolute value of -12 on your own.
A majority (12).