answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

To prove that their history claims are right. Can’t say something absurd unless there’s proof!

User Avatar

IQ is 2

Lvl 5
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

Gardner Fisher

Lvl 1
2y ago
Im not sure about that
User Avatar

Elroy Murazik

Lvl 1
2y ago
tyyy
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

They use sources because it explains what happened and why. It also replaces paragraphs

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

to be happy

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
3y ago

Klkk

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why do historians have to evaluate the primary and secondary sources they use to answer their questions?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why do historians have to evaluate the primary and the secondary sources they used to answer their questions?

to be happy


Why do historians have to evaluate primary and secondary sources they use to answer their questions?

to be happy


Why do historians have to evaluate the primary and secondary sources they used to answer questions?

to be happy


Why do historians have to to evaluate the primary and secondary sources they use to answer their questions?

just give me the answer it isnt hard


Why do historians have to evaluate the primary secondary sources they use to answer their question?

to be happy


What source do historians use to answer questions?

They use primary and secondary sources


What do the two different kinds of sources used most by historians to answer questions about the past include?

primary and secondary sources.


The two different kinds of sources used most by historians to answer questions about the past include what?

primary and secondary sources.


What tools do historians use?

Primary sources, secondary sources, and oral history.


What tools do historians?

historians use primary soucres and secondary sources


Are primary sources or secondary sources more valuable to modern historians?

secondary


How would a secondary source be beneficial to a historian studying a particular event. and ldquoApex and?

It would eliminate the need for her to evaluate primary sources that have already been analyzed by other historians.